HFG.TO vs. FMAX.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

HFG.TO (Hamilton Global Financials ETF) and FMAX.TO (Hamilton U.S. Financials Yield Maximizer ETF) are both Financials Equities funds from Hamilton. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HFG.TO returned 17.10% vs 8.52% for FMAX.TO. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

HFG.TO vs. FMAX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Global Financials ETF (HFG.TO) and Hamilton U.S. Financials Yield Maximizer ETF (FMAX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFG.TO achieves a 7.76% return, which is significantly higher than FMAX.TO's 1.74% return.

HFG.TO

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 6.00%
• 6M: 7.83%
• YTD: 7.76%
• 1Y: 17.10%
• 3Y*: 25.28%
• 5Y*: 15.43%
• 10Y*: —

FMAX.TO

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 4.64%
• 6M: 1.58%
• YTD: 1.74%
• 1Y: 8.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFG.TO vs. FMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
HFG.TO Hamilton Global Financials ETF	7.76%	22.93%	30.03%
FMAX.TO Hamilton U.S. Financials Yield Maximizer ETF	1.74%	7.70%	33.11%

Correlation

The correlation between HFG.TO and FMAX.TO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2024	0.50

The correlation between HFG.TO and FMAX.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HFG.TO vs. FMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFG.TO

HFG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 42
HFG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
HFG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
HFG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 48
HFG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
HFG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 38

FMAX.TO

FMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 18
FMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
FMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
FMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 19
FMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
FMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFG.TO vs. FMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Global Financials ETF (HFG.TO) and Hamilton U.S. Financials Yield Maximizer ETF (FMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HFG.TO	FMAX.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	0.58	+0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	0.88	+1.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.11	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.57	0.54	+1.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.96	1.29	+3.67

HFG.TO vs. FMAX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the FMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFG.TO and FMAX.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HFG.TO vs. FMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFG.TO drawdown since its inception was -42.71%, which is greater than FMAX.TO's maximum drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFG.TO and FMAX.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HFG.TO	FMAX.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.71%	-17.84%	-24.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.95%	-15.83%	+4.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.54%	-1.48%	+0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.38%	-4.12%	-1.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.46%	6.62%	-3.16%

Volatility

HFG.TO vs. FMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hamilton Global Financials ETF (HFG.TO) is 3.60%, while Hamilton U.S. Financials Yield Maximizer ETF (FMAX.TO) has a volatility of 4.60%. This indicates that HFG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HFG.TO	FMAX.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.60%	4.60%	-1.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.69%	11.88%	-1.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.10%	14.89%	-1.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.03%	16.01%	+0.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.26%	16.01%	+4.25%

Dividends

HFG.TO vs. FMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison

HFG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, less than FMAX.TO's 11.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FMAX.TO Hamilton U.S. Financials Yield Maximizer ETF	11.67%	11.03%	9.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HFG.TO Hamilton Global Financials ETF	2.40%	2.55%	3.05%	3.86%	10.09%	4.16%	1.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HFG.TO and FMAX.TO in my portfolio?

HFG.TO and FMAX.TO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.