PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMAX.TO vs. HBA.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FMAX.TO vs. HBA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton U.S. Financials Yield Maximizer ETF (FMAX.TO) and Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HBA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FMAX.TO vs. HBA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FMAX.TO
Hamilton U.S. Financials Yield Maximizer ETF
-9.81%7.70%32.95%
HBA.TO
Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF
0.36%13.01%24.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMAX.TO achieves a -9.81% return, which is significantly lower than HBA.TO's 0.36% return.


FMAX.TO

1D
0.49%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
-9.81%
6M
-7.70%
1Y
-4.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HBA.TO

1D
-0.07%
1M
-8.86%
YTD
0.36%
6M
0.66%
1Y
18.74%
3Y*
19.43%
5Y*
13.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FMAX.TO vs. HBA.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison


Return for Risk

FMAX.TO vs. HBA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMAX.TO
FMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

HBA.TO
HBA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
HBA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
HBA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMAX.TO vs. HBA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton U.S. Financials Yield Maximizer ETF (FMAX.TO) and Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HBA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMAX.TOHBA.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.22

1.00

-1.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.16

1.42

-1.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.19

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.27

1.85

-2.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.77

4.60

-5.37

FMAX.TO vs. HBA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the HBA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMAX.TO and HBA.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMAX.TOHBA.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

1.00

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

1.01

-0.23

Correlation

The correlation between FMAX.TO and HBA.TO is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FMAX.TO vs. HBA.TO - Dividend Comparison

FMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.57%, more than HBA.TO's 3.07% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
FMAX.TO
Hamilton U.S. Financials Yield Maximizer ETF
11.57%11.03%9.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HBA.TO
Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF
3.07%4.11%4.45%6.67%8.56%5.81%2.66%

Drawdowns

FMAX.TO vs. HBA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.84%, smaller than the maximum HBA.TO drawdown of -21.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMAX.TO and HBA.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FMAX.TOHBA.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.84%

-21.15%

+3.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.83%

-10.17%

-5.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.66%

-10.17%

-2.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.63%

-4.46%

+0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.53%

4.08%

+1.45%

Volatility

FMAX.TO vs. HBA.TO - Volatility Comparison

Hamilton U.S. Financials Yield Maximizer ETF (FMAX.TO) and Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HBA.TO) have volatilities of 4.78% and 4.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FMAX.TOHBA.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.78%

4.78%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.99%

12.95%

-0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.32%

18.91%

+0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.31%

17.59%

-1.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.31%

18.17%

-1.86%