PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMAX.TO vs. LMAX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FMAX.TO vs. LMAX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton U.S. Financials Yield Maximizer ETF (FMAX.TO) and Hamilton Healthcare Yield Maximizer ETF (LMAX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FMAX.TO vs. LMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FMAX.TO
Hamilton U.S. Financials Yield Maximizer ETF
-9.81%7.70%32.95%
LMAX.TO
Hamilton Healthcare Yield Maximizer ETF
-3.55%7.03%4.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMAX.TO achieves a -9.81% return, which is significantly lower than LMAX.TO's -3.55% return.


FMAX.TO

1D
0.49%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
-9.81%
6M
-7.70%
1Y
-4.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LMAX.TO

1D
0.30%
1M
-6.57%
YTD
-3.55%
6M
3.86%
1Y
-3.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FMAX.TO vs. LMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMAX.TO has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than LMAX.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FMAX.TO vs. LMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMAX.TO
FMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

LMAX.TO
LMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
LMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
LMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMAX.TO vs. LMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton U.S. Financials Yield Maximizer ETF (FMAX.TO) and Hamilton Healthcare Yield Maximizer ETF (LMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMAX.TOLMAX.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.22

-0.23

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.16

-0.21

+0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

0.97

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.27

-0.19

-0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.77

-0.32

-0.44

FMAX.TO vs. LMAX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is comparable to the LMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMAX.TO and LMAX.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMAX.TOLMAX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

-0.23

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.28

+0.50

Correlation

The correlation between FMAX.TO and LMAX.TO is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FMAX.TO vs. LMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison

FMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.57%, less than LMAX.TO's 11.91% yield.


TTM20252024
FMAX.TO
Hamilton U.S. Financials Yield Maximizer ETF
11.57%11.03%9.19%
LMAX.TO
Hamilton Healthcare Yield Maximizer ETF
11.91%12.51%11.36%

Drawdowns

FMAX.TO vs. LMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.84%, which is greater than LMAX.TO's maximum drawdown of -15.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMAX.TO and LMAX.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FMAX.TOLMAX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.84%

-15.87%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.83%

-12.62%

-3.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.66%

-8.34%

-4.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.63%

-4.90%

+1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.53%

8.00%

-2.47%

Volatility

FMAX.TO vs. LMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison

Hamilton U.S. Financials Yield Maximizer ETF (FMAX.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.78% compared to Hamilton Healthcare Yield Maximizer ETF (LMAX.TO) at 3.75%. This indicates that FMAX.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FMAX.TOLMAX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.78%

3.75%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.99%

9.73%

+2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.32%

16.63%

+2.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.31%

13.68%

+2.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.31%

13.68%

+2.63%