HFEQ vs. RSBY
HFEQ (Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF) and RSBY (Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HFEQ is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Unlimited, while RSBY is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Return Stacked. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. HFEQ charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for RSBY.
Performance
HFEQ vs. RSBY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HFEQ
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSBY
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- 6M
- 17.92%
- YTD
- 18.52%
- 1Y
- 17.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HFEQ vs. RSBY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HFEQ Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF | 9.98% | 14.35% |
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF | 18.52% | -0.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between HFEQ and RSBY is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | -0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HFEQ vs. RSBY — Risk / Return Rank
HFEQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RSBY
HFEQ vs. RSBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF (HFEQ) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HFEQ | RSBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.15 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.04 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HFEQ vs. RSBY - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFEQ | RSBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -23.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -6.45% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -13.35% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.39% | — |
Volatility
HFEQ vs. RSBY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HFEQ | RSBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.15% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.37% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 11.41% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 13.37% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 13.37% | — |
HFEQ vs. RSBY - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFEQ has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than RSBY's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
HFEQ vs. RSBY - Dividend Comparison
HFEQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HFEQ Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF | 9.59% | 10.55% | 0.00% |
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF | 1.75% | 2.07% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HFEQ and RSBY have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RSBY is cheaper at 0.98% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RSBY is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for HFEQ.
HFEQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.59%, compared with 1.75% for RSBY.
HFEQ is categorized as Long-Short, while RSBY is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: Unlimited and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for HFEQ and 0.98% for RSBY.
Find the right allocation for HFEQ and RSBY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer