HFEQ vs. HTUS
HFEQ (Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF) and HTUS (Hull Tactical US ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HFEQ charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for HTUS.
Performance
HFEQ vs. HTUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HFEQ achieves a 9.98% return, which is significantly higher than HTUS's 8.67% return.
HFEQ
- 1D
- -3.97%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- YTD
- 9.98%
- 6M
- 8.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HTUS
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -1.25%
- YTD
- 8.67%
- 6M
- 7.69%
- 1Y
- 22.77%
- 3Y*
- 20.25%
- 5Y*
- 14.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.17%
HFEQ vs. HTUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HFEQ Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF | 9.98% | 14.35% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 8.67% | 10.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between HFEQ and HTUS is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HFEQ vs. HTUS — Risk / Return Rank
HFEQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HTUS
HFEQ vs. HTUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF (HFEQ) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HFEQ | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.63 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.97 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HFEQ vs. HTUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFEQ drawdown since its inception was -12.46%, smaller than the maximum HTUS drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFEQ and HTUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFEQ | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.46% | -47.50% | +35.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.97% | -2.92% | -1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.44% | -4.05% | +1.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.76% | — |
Volatility
HFEQ vs. HTUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HFEQ | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.02% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.90% | 12.00% | +9.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 19.10% | +2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 21.49% | +0.41% |
HFEQ vs. HTUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFEQ has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than HTUS's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
HFEQ vs. HTUS - Dividend Comparison
HFEQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HTUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.94%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFEQ Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF | 9.59% | 10.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 10.94% | 11.89% | 17.80% | 1.18% | 5.63% | 7.20% | 3.77% | 0.92% | 8.69% | 8.29% | 3.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HFEQ and HTUS have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HTUS is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HTUS is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for HFEQ.
HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.94%, compared with 9.59% for HFEQ.
They also come from different issuers: Unlimited and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for HFEQ and 0.97% for HTUS.
Find the right allocation for HFEQ and HTUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer