HFEQ vs. BNO
HFEQ (Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - HFEQ is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Unlimited, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. HFEQ is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.28, they often move in opposite directions. HFEQ charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.
Performance
HFEQ vs. BNO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HFEQ achieves a 14.04% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return.
HFEQ
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 5.50%
- YTD
- 14.04%
- 6M
- 13.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNO
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- -10.29%
- YTD
- 90.47%
- 6M
- 86.00%
- 1Y
- 91.89%
- 3Y*
- 27.93%
- 5Y*
- 24.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
HFEQ vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HFEQ Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF | 14.04% | 14.92% |
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 90.47% | -6.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between HFEQ and BNO is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | -0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HFEQ vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank
HFEQ
BNO
HFEQ vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF (HFEQ) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HFEQ | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.66 | 0.14 | +1.52 |
Drawdowns
HFEQ vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFEQ drawdown since its inception was -12.46%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFEQ and BNO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFEQ | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.46% | -87.06% | +74.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -10.29% | +9.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.45% | -40.17% | +37.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.45% | — |
Volatility
HFEQ vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HFEQ | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 36.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.60% | 41.46% | -19.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.60% | 35.38% | -13.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.60% | 36.68% | -15.08% |
HFEQ vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFEQ has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
HFEQ vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison
HFEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.25%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HFEQ Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF | 9.25% | 10.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HFEQ and BNO have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BNO is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BNO is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for HFEQ.
HFEQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.25%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.
HFEQ is categorized as Long-Short, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Unlimited and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for HFEQ and 0.90% for BNO.
Find the right allocation for HFEQ and BNO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer