HFEAX vs. JGLTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson European Focus Fund (HFEAX) and Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX).
HFEAX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Aug 30, 2001. JGLTX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Jan 17, 2000.
Performance
HFEAX vs. JGLTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HFEAX vs. JGLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFEAX Janus Henderson European Focus Fund | -6.48% | 39.88% | 2.11% | 18.26% | -16.11% | 18.83% | 26.49% | 31.42% | -27.83% | 16.11% |
JGLTX Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio | -7.02% | 25.19% | 32.10% | 54.55% | -36.42% | 18.28% | 50.42% | 45.29% | 1.17% | 45.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HFEAX achieves a -6.48% return, which is significantly higher than JGLTX's -7.02% return. Over the past 10 years, HFEAX has underperformed JGLTX with an annualized return of 7.96%, while JGLTX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.70% annualized return.
HFEAX
- 1D
- 3.05%
- 1M
- -7.32%
- YTD
- -6.48%
- 6M
- -2.07%
- 1Y
- 17.99%
- 3Y*
- 13.17%
- 5Y*
- 8.27%
- 10Y*
- 7.96%
JGLTX
- 1D
- 3.97%
- 1M
- -7.40%
- YTD
- -7.02%
- 6M
- -6.55%
- 1Y
- 27.79%
- 3Y*
- 24.91%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- 20.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HFEAX vs. JGLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFEAX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than JGLTX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HFEAX vs. JGLTX — Risk / Return Rank
HFEAX
JGLTX
HFEAX vs. JGLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson European Focus Fund (HFEAX) and Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HFEAX | JGLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 1.17 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.47 | 1.74 | -0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.24 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 1.81 | -0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.62 | 6.15 | -1.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HFEAX | JGLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 1.17 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.44 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.85 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.30 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between HFEAX and JGLTX is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
HFEAX vs. JGLTX - Dividend Comparison
HFEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than JGLTX's 9.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFEAX Janus Henderson European Focus Fund | 1.20% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 0.13% | 0.28% | 0.98% | 4.26% | 1.70% | 2.59% | 0.72% |
JGLTX Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio | 9.66% | 8.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 26.96% | 14.48% | 7.71% | 6.81% | 4.95% | 5.68% | 3.71% | 16.11% |
Drawdowns
HFEAX vs. JGLTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFEAX drawdown since its inception was -66.73%, smaller than the maximum JGLTX drawdown of -81.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFEAX and JGLTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFEAX | JGLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.73% | -81.78% | +15.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.43% | -15.81% | +1.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.16% | -45.18% | +12.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.73% | -45.18% | +8.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.58% | -12.47% | +0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.92% | -36.82% | +25.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.68% | 4.65% | -0.97% |
Volatility
HFEAX vs. JGLTX - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson European Focus Fund (HFEAX) and Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) have volatilities of 8.17% and 8.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HFEAX | JGLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.17% | 8.22% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.04% | 16.11% | -4.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.18% | 25.28% | -8.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.85% | 25.93% | -8.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.76% | 24.31% | -5.55% |