PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFCVX vs. HBFBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFCVX vs. HBFBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX) and Hennessy Balanced Fund (HBFBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFCVX achieves a 13.70% return, which is significantly higher than HBFBX's 5.73% return. Over the past 10 years, HFCVX has outperformed HBFBX with an annualized return of 11.15%, while HBFBX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.95% annualized return.


HFCVX

1D
0.88%
1M
2.10%
YTD
13.70%
6M
14.88%
1Y
26.29%
3Y*
16.75%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*
11.15%

HBFBX

1D
0.23%
1M
2.47%
YTD
5.73%
6M
5.32%
1Y
12.67%
3Y*
9.60%
5Y*
6.13%
10Y*
5.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFCVX vs. HBFBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HFCVX
Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund
13.70%18.27%9.59%5.81%6.12%29.94%-6.39%20.84%-9.50%19.21%
HBFBX
Hennessy Balanced Fund
5.73%9.90%4.81%7.62%3.83%8.07%-2.98%9.71%0.06%8.34%

Correlation

The correlation between HFCVX and HBFBX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 1996

0.87

The correlation between HFCVX and HBFBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFCVX vs. HBFBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFCVX
HFCVX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HFCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
HFCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

HBFBX
HBFBX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
HBFBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBFBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBFBX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
HBFBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBFBX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFCVX vs. HBFBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX) and Hennessy Balanced Fund (HBFBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HFCVXHBFBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.43

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.07

4.01

+3.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.66

10.22

+11.44

HFCVX vs. HBFBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFCVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is comparable to the HBFBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFCVX and HBFBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HFCVXHBFBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91

2.31

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.85

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.73

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.48

-0.07

Drawdowns

HFCVX vs. HBFBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFCVX drawdown since its inception was -65.75%, which is greater than HBFBX's maximum drawdown of -41.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFCVX and HBFBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFCVXHBFBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.75%

-41.61%

-24.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.77%

-3.20%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.32%

-6.10%

-5.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.81%

-10.22%

-6.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.39%

-17.24%

-22.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-0.35%

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.24%

-4.06%

-4.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

1.25%

-0.02%

Volatility

HFCVX vs. HBFBX - Volatility Comparison

Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX) has a higher volatility of 2.79% compared to Hennessy Balanced Fund (HBFBX) at 1.78%. This indicates that HFCVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HBFBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFCVXHBFBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

1.78%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.85%

4.14%

+2.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.16%

5.54%

+3.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.26%

7.23%

+6.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.46%

8.14%

+8.32%

HFCVX vs. HBFBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFCVX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than HBFBX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFCVX vs. HBFBX - Dividend Comparison

HFCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.50%, more than HBFBX's 1.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HBFBX
Hennessy Balanced Fund
1.77%1.90%5.40%4.62%9.50%3.79%0.95%5.20%5.51%7.62%7.76%2.53%
HFCVX
Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund
6.50%7.39%4.56%3.57%10.33%4.81%2.58%6.58%17.16%14.97%2.26%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFCVX and HBFBX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFCVX has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to HBFBX (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFCVX dropped -65.75% vs HBFBX's -41.61%.

HFCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFCVX and HBFBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer