PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFCSX vs. BFGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFCSX vs. BFGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Focus Fund (HFCSX) and Baron Focused Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BFGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFCSX achieves a 9.80% return, which is significantly higher than BFGIX's 3.92% return. Over the past 10 years, HFCSX has underperformed BFGIX with an annualized return of 11.80%, while BFGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.44% annualized return.


HFCSX

1D
-1.25%
1M
9.83%
YTD
9.80%
6M
15.70%
1Y
46.65%
3Y*
22.51%
5Y*
10.13%
10Y*
11.80%

BFGIX

1D
2.36%
1M
7.03%
YTD
3.92%
6M
16.37%
1Y
25.20%
3Y*
21.80%
5Y*
13.02%
10Y*
21.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFCSX vs. BFGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HFCSX
Hennessy Focus Fund
9.80%28.30%14.67%20.99%-24.92%32.04%5.47%34.96%-10.93%19.27%
BFGIX
Baron Focused Growth Fund Institutional Shares
3.92%22.26%29.85%27.78%-28.05%19.00%122.92%30.34%4.08%26.58%

Correlation

The correlation between HFCSX and BFGIX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2009

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between HFCSX and BFGIX has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFCSX vs. BFGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFCSX
HFCSX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
HFCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
HFCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

BFGIX
BFGIX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
BFGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
BFGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFCSX vs. BFGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Focus Fund (HFCSX) and Baron Focused Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BFGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HFCSXBFGIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.64

1.33

+0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.28

2.43

-0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.28

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

2.60

-0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.36

7.04

-1.68

HFCSX vs. BFGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFCSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the BFGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFCSX and BFGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HFCSXBFGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

1.33

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.59

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.90

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.79

-0.34

Drawdowns

HFCSX vs. BFGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFCSX drawdown since its inception was -59.41%, which is greater than BFGIX's maximum drawdown of -43.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFCSX and BFGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFCSXBFGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.41%

-43.62%

-15.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.90%

-9.69%

-10.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.02%

-20.97%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.13%

-35.71%

+2.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.07%

-43.62%

-3.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.56%

0.00%

-5.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.86%

-7.87%

-1.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.69%

3.57%

+5.12%

Volatility

HFCSX vs. BFGIX - Volatility Comparison

Hennessy Focus Fund (HFCSX) has a higher volatility of 9.94% compared to Baron Focused Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BFGIX) at 4.66%. This indicates that HFCSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BFGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFCSXBFGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.94%

4.66%

+5.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.53%

15.53%

+5.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.86%

19.00%

+9.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.81%

22.34%

+0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.60%

23.99%

-1.39%

HFCSX vs. BFGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFCSX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BFGIX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFCSX vs. BFGIX - Dividend Comparison

HFCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.13%, while BFGIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BFGIX
Baron Focused Growth Fund Institutional Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%11.79%15.01%2.78%1.74%1.05%2.07%5.92%6.01%
HFCSX
Hennessy Focus Fund
44.13%48.46%15.94%24.51%15.15%17.19%35.80%10.78%22.20%0.01%0.00%0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFCSX and BFGIX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFCSX has higher volatility (9.94%) compared to BFGIX (4.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFCSX dropped -59.41% vs BFGIX's -43.62%.

HFCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFCSX and BFGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer