PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFCGX vs. SPECX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFCGX vs. SPECX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX) and Alger Spectra Fund (SPECX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFCGX achieves a 13.58% return, which is significantly higher than SPECX's 10.78% return. Over the past 10 years, HFCGX has underperformed SPECX with an annualized return of 12.81%, while SPECX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.03% annualized return.


HFCGX

1D
0.80%
1M
1.86%
YTD
13.58%
6M
12.54%
1Y
19.12%
3Y*
22.97%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
12.81%

SPECX

1D
-1.89%
1M
2.33%
YTD
10.78%
6M
8.52%
1Y
32.59%
3Y*
32.89%
5Y*
13.56%
10Y*
18.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFCGX vs. SPECX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HFCGX
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund
13.58%4.78%31.45%19.58%-4.97%29.94%17.73%20.70%-21.39%16.60%
SPECX
Alger Spectra Fund
10.78%29.16%47.52%41.34%-39.37%12.61%43.66%32.15%-0.82%31.11%

Correlation

The correlation between HFCGX and SPECX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 1996

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between HFCGX and SPECX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFCGX vs. SPECX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFCGX
HFCGX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
HFCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
HFCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

SPECX
SPECX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SPECX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPECX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPECX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
SPECX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPECX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFCGX vs. SPECX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX) and Alger Spectra Fund (SPECX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HFCGXSPECXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.25

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

1.71

+0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.30

5.32

+2.99

HFCGX vs. SPECX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the SPECX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFCGX and SPECX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HFCGX vs. SPECX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFCGX drawdown since its inception was -62.35%, smaller than the maximum SPECX drawdown of -72.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFCGX and SPECX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFCGXSPECXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.35%

-72.19%

+9.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-20.03%

+12.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.86%

-27.91%

+5.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.30%

-54.82%

+28.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.22%

-54.82%

+0.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.12%

-3.12%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.21%

-24.01%

+8.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

6.43%

-3.97%

Volatility

HFCGX vs. SPECX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX) is 5.87%, while Alger Spectra Fund (SPECX) has a volatility of 9.77%. This indicates that HFCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPECX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFCGXSPECXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.87%

9.77%

-3.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.42%

18.49%

-8.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.52%

23.50%

-9.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.04%

32.90%

-8.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.85%

28.00%

-2.15%

HFCGX vs. SPECX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFCGX has a 1.34% expense ratio, which is lower than SPECX's 1.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFCGX vs. SPECX - Dividend Comparison

HFCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPECX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.74%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFCGX
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%14.11%0.38%3.58%26.58%0.00%0.00%10.47%0.00%0.00%0.11%
SPECX
Alger Spectra Fund
6.74%7.47%6.49%0.00%2.70%34.41%9.19%7.20%12.09%6.14%0.00%8.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFCGX and SPECX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPECX has higher volatility (9.77%) compared to HFCGX (5.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFCGX dropped -62.35% vs SPECX's -72.19%.

HFCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFCGX and SPECX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer