HFCGX vs. HJPNX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

HFCGX (Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund) and HJPNX (Hennessy Japan Fund) are both mutual funds - HFCGX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Hennessy, while HJPNX is a Japan Equities fund managed by Hennessy. Over the past 10 years, HFCGX returned 12.04%/yr vs 9.54%/yr for HJPNX. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. HFCGX charges 1.34%/yr vs 1.44%/yr for HJPNX.

Performance

HFCGX vs. HJPNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX) and Hennessy Japan Fund (HJPNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFCGX achieves a 12.20% return, which is significantly lower than HJPNX's 20.51% return. Over the past 10 years, HFCGX has outperformed HJPNX with an annualized return of 12.04%, while HJPNX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.54% annualized return.

HFCGX

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 2.66%
• 6M: 6.49%
• YTD: 12.20%
• 1Y: 19.86%
• 3Y*: 17.85%
• 5Y*: 13.89%
• 10Y*: 12.04%
• ALL TIME*: 9.50%

HJPNX

• 1D: -1.16%
• 1M: 0.41%
• 6M: 15.50%
• YTD: 20.51%
• 1Y: 34.00%
• 3Y*: 19.82%
• 5Y*: 7.46%
• 10Y*: 9.54%
• ALL TIME*: 8.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HFCGX Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
HJPNX Hennessy Japan Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

HFCGX vs. HJPNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HFCGX Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund	12.20%	4.78%	31.45%	19.58%	-4.97%	29.94%	17.73%	20.70%	-21.39%	16.60%
HJPNX Hennessy Japan Fund	20.51%	14.58%	18.72%	22.90%	-30.65%	-3.08%	25.52%	18.04%	-6.57%	32.04%

Correlation

The correlation between HFCGX and HJPNX is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.51
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2003	0.46

The correlation between HFCGX and HJPNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HFCGX vs. HJPNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HFCGX

HFCGX Risk / Return Rank: 44
HFCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
HFCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
HFCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
HFCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
HFCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

HJPNX

HJPNX Risk / Return Rank: 55
HJPNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
HJPNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
HJPNX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
HJPNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
HJPNX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HFCGX vs. HJPNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX) and Hennessy Japan Fund (HJPNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HFCGX	HJPNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	1.46	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.86	2.08	-0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.26	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	2.43	-0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.44	8.19	-1.75

HFCGX vs. HJPNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the HJPNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFCGX and HJPNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HFCGX vs. HJPNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFCGX drawdown since its inception was -62.35%, roughly equal to the maximum HJPNX drawdown of -59.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFCGX and HJPNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HFCGX	HJPNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.35%	-59.65%	-2.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.82%	-14.18%	+6.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.86%	-20.06%	-2.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.30%	-44.72%	+18.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.22%	-44.72%	-9.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.30%	-2.65%	-1.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.17%	-15.47%	+0.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.82%	4.20%	-1.38%

Volatility

HFCGX vs. HJPNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX) is 6.37%, while Hennessy Japan Fund (HJPNX) has a volatility of 7.20%. This indicates that HFCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HJPNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HFCGX	HJPNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.37%	7.20%	-0.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.94%	18.30%	-6.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.57%	23.64%	-9.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.86%	21.33%	+2.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.88%	18.92%	+6.96%

HFCGX vs. HJPNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFCGX has a 1.34% expense ratio, which is lower than HJPNX's 1.44% expense ratio.

Dividends

HFCGX vs. HJPNX - Dividend Comparison

HFCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HJPNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.65%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HFCGX Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	14.11%	0.38%	3.58%	26.58%	0.00%	0.00%	10.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.11%
HJPNX Hennessy Japan Fund	10.65%	12.83%	5.80%	5.87%	0.00%	0.89%	0.00%	0.13%	0.04%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HFCGX and HJPNX in my portfolio?

HFCGX and HJPNX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HFCGX or HJPNX?

HJPNX has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to HFCGX (6.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFCGX dropped -62.35% vs HJPNX's -59.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HJPNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.