PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFCGX vs. BOSOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFCGX vs. BOSOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX) and Boston Trust Small Cap Fund (BOSOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFCGX achieves a 13.58% return, which is significantly higher than BOSOX's 10.07% return. Over the past 10 years, HFCGX has outperformed BOSOX with an annualized return of 12.81%, while BOSOX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.86% annualized return.


HFCGX

1D
0.80%
1M
1.86%
YTD
13.58%
6M
12.54%
1Y
19.12%
3Y*
22.97%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
12.81%

BOSOX

1D
-0.16%
1M
3.75%
YTD
10.07%
6M
7.35%
1Y
10.15%
3Y*
9.16%
5Y*
5.72%
10Y*
10.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFCGX vs. BOSOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HFCGX
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund
13.58%4.78%31.45%19.58%-4.97%29.94%17.73%20.70%-21.39%16.60%
BOSOX
Boston Trust Small Cap Fund
10.07%-4.04%12.52%10.09%-9.05%28.10%8.27%38.35%-6.01%12.24%

Correlation

The correlation between HFCGX and BOSOX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2005

0.85

The correlation between HFCGX and BOSOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFCGX vs. BOSOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFCGX
HFCGX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
HFCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
HFCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

BOSOX
BOSOX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
BOSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
BOSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFCGX vs. BOSOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX) and Boston Trust Small Cap Fund (BOSOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HFCGXBOSOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.14

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

1.12

+1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.30

3.38

+4.92

HFCGX vs. BOSOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the BOSOX Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFCGX and BOSOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HFCGX vs. BOSOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFCGX drawdown since its inception was -62.35%, which is greater than BOSOX's maximum drawdown of -51.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFCGX and BOSOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFCGXBOSOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.35%

-51.32%

-11.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-10.69%

+2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.86%

-22.36%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.30%

-22.36%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.22%

-36.79%

-17.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.12%

-3.66%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.21%

-7.27%

-7.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

3.54%

-1.08%

Volatility

HFCGX vs. BOSOX - Volatility Comparison

Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX) has a higher volatility of 5.87% compared to Boston Trust Small Cap Fund (BOSOX) at 3.93%. This indicates that HFCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOSOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFCGXBOSOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.87%

3.93%

+1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.42%

10.26%

+0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.52%

15.22%

-1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.04%

17.82%

+6.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.85%

19.57%

+6.28%

HFCGX vs. BOSOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFCGX has a 1.34% expense ratio, which is higher than BOSOX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFCGX vs. BOSOX - Dividend Comparison

HFCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOSOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOSOX
Boston Trust Small Cap Fund
4.01%4.41%6.52%0.78%5.09%8.93%2.56%12.46%16.19%9.13%3.14%18.92%
HFCGX
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%14.11%0.38%3.58%26.58%0.00%0.00%10.47%0.00%0.00%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFCGX and BOSOX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFCGX has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to BOSOX (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFCGX dropped -62.35% vs BOSOX's -51.32%.

HFCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFCGX and BOSOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer