PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFCGX vs. BFOCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFCGX vs. BFOCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX) and Berkshire Focus Fund (BFOCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFCGX achieves a 14.84% return, which is significantly lower than BFOCX's 61.24% return. Over the past 10 years, HFCGX has underperformed BFOCX with an annualized return of 12.75%, while BFOCX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.91% annualized return.


HFCGX

1D
1.16%
1M
4.16%
YTD
14.84%
6M
16.17%
1Y
21.13%
3Y*
24.56%
5Y*
12.52%
10Y*
12.75%

BFOCX

1D
5.13%
1M
21.94%
YTD
61.24%
6M
60.38%
1Y
104.56%
3Y*
52.88%
5Y*
13.06%
10Y*
22.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFCGX vs. BFOCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HFCGX
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund
14.84%4.78%31.45%19.58%-4.97%29.94%17.73%20.70%-21.39%16.60%
BFOCX
Berkshire Focus Fund
61.24%28.67%59.16%50.20%-65.06%-1.79%90.81%40.56%10.04%44.10%

Correlation

The correlation between HFCGX and BFOCX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1997

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between HFCGX and BFOCX has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFCGX vs. BFOCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFCGX
HFCGX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
HFCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
HFCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

BFOCX
BFOCX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BFOCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFOCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFOCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BFOCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFOCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFCGX vs. BFOCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX) and Berkshire Focus Fund (BFOCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HFCGXBFOCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.73

2.93

-1.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.53

3.20

-0.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.44

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

6.25

-3.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.63

18.20

-8.57

HFCGX vs. BFOCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the BFOCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFCGX and BFOCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HFCGXBFOCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

2.93

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.30

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.61

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.26

+0.13

Drawdowns

HFCGX vs. BFOCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFCGX drawdown since its inception was -62.35%, smaller than the maximum BFOCX drawdown of -95.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFCGX and BFOCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFCGXBFOCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.35%

-95.80%

+33.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-17.22%

+9.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.86%

-40.55%

+17.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.30%

-72.53%

+46.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.22%

-72.53%

+18.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.23%

-58.18%

+42.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

5.91%

-3.54%

Volatility

HFCGX vs. BFOCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX) is 4.38%, while Berkshire Focus Fund (BFOCX) has a volatility of 13.25%. This indicates that HFCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BFOCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFCGXBFOCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.38%

13.25%

-8.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.39%

29.45%

-20.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.91%

36.93%

-24.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.07%

43.52%

-19.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.81%

37.56%

-11.75%

HFCGX vs. BFOCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFCGX has a 1.34% expense ratio, which is lower than BFOCX's 1.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFCGX vs. BFOCX - Dividend Comparison

Neither HFCGX nor BFOCX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BFOCX
Berkshire Focus Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%19.54%21.20%14.20%5.70%21.73%0.14%9.52%
HFCGX
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%14.11%0.38%3.58%26.58%0.00%0.00%10.47%0.00%0.00%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFCGX and BFOCX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BFOCX has higher volatility (13.25%) compared to HFCGX (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFCGX dropped -62.35% vs BFOCX's -95.80%.

BFOCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFCGX and BFOCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer