PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFOCX vs. MSEQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFOCX vs. MSEQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Berkshire Focus Fund (BFOCX) and Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFOCX achieves a 61.24% return, which is significantly higher than MSEQX's 0.37% return. Over the past 10 years, BFOCX has outperformed MSEQX with an annualized return of 22.91%, while MSEQX has yielded a comparatively lower 17.55% annualized return.


BFOCX

1D
5.13%
1M
21.94%
YTD
61.24%
6M
60.38%
1Y
104.56%
3Y*
52.88%
5Y*
13.06%
10Y*
22.91%

MSEQX

1D
0.72%
1M
7.34%
YTD
0.37%
6M
0.96%
1Y
11.46%
3Y*
29.85%
5Y*
1.68%
10Y*
17.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFOCX vs. MSEQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BFOCX
Berkshire Focus Fund
61.24%28.67%59.16%50.20%-65.06%-1.79%90.81%40.56%10.04%44.10%
MSEQX
Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I
0.37%24.78%46.65%50.36%-60.18%-0.00%115.60%38.25%5.38%43.91%

Correlation

The correlation between BFOCX and MSEQX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1997

0.83

The correlation between BFOCX and MSEQX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.88 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFOCX vs. MSEQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFOCX
BFOCX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BFOCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFOCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFOCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BFOCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFOCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

MSEQX
MSEQX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
MSEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
MSEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFOCX vs. MSEQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Berkshire Focus Fund (BFOCX) and Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BFOCXMSEQXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.93

0.45

+2.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.20

0.81

+2.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.10

+0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.25

0.47

+5.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.20

1.02

+17.18

BFOCX vs. MSEQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFOCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is higher than the MSEQX Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFOCX and MSEQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BFOCXMSEQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93

0.45

+2.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.04

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.52

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.48

-0.22

Drawdowns

BFOCX vs. MSEQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFOCX drawdown since its inception was -95.80%, which is greater than MSEQX's maximum drawdown of -69.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFOCX and MSEQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFOCXMSEQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.80%

-69.48%

-26.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.22%

-27.73%

+10.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.55%

-32.52%

-8.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.53%

-69.48%

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.53%

-69.48%

-3.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-12.26%

+12.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.18%

-16.90%

-41.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.91%

12.80%

-6.89%

Volatility

BFOCX vs. MSEQX - Volatility Comparison

Berkshire Focus Fund (BFOCX) has a higher volatility of 13.25% compared to Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX) at 8.06%. This indicates that BFOCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSEQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFOCXMSEQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.25%

8.06%

+5.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.45%

21.31%

+8.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.93%

28.00%

+8.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.52%

39.71%

+3.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.56%

33.75%

+3.81%

BFOCX vs. MSEQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFOCX has a 1.94% expense ratio, which is higher than MSEQX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFOCX vs. MSEQX - Dividend Comparison

Neither BFOCX nor MSEQX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BFOCX
Berkshire Focus Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%19.54%21.20%14.20%5.70%21.73%0.14%9.52%
MSEQX
Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I
0.00%0.00%0.55%0.05%16.79%24.24%9.36%21.39%5.38%21.18%12.71%7.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


BFOCX and MSEQX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BFOCX has higher volatility (13.25%) compared to MSEQX (8.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFOCX dropped -95.80% vs MSEQX's -69.48%.

BFOCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFOCX and MSEQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer