PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HEZU vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HEZU vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF (HEZU) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEZU achieves a 15.20% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 11.75% return. Over the past 10 years, HEZU has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 12.50%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.


HEZU

1D
1.29%
1M
0.86%
6M
9.83%
YTD
15.20%
1Y
28.69%
3Y*
19.41%
5Y*
13.05%
10Y*
12.50%
ALL TIME*
11.05%

IVV

1D
1.47%
1M
1.72%
6M
9.57%
YTD
11.75%
1Y
23.34%
3Y*
20.85%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.14%
ALL TIME*
8.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$807.52K$1.37M$1.59M
$3.33B$3.25B$5.92B

HEZU vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HEZU
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF
15.20%25.93%10.63%22.98%-9.54%23.51%0.52%29.48%-10.23%14.26%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
11.75%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between HEZU and IVV is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2014

0.75

The correlation between HEZU and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

HEZU vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HEZU
IVV

Financial Services

24.7%
12.5%

Industrials

20.5%
7.9%

Technology

16.8%
37.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
8.9%

Utilities

6.5%
2.6%

Healthcare

5.8%
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
4.8%

Communication Services

3.9%
9.6%

Basic Materials

3.9%
1.8%

Energy

3.5%
3.3%

Real Estate

0.8%
1.9%

Financial Services

HEZU
24.7%
IVV
12.5%

Industrials

HEZU
20.5%
IVV
7.9%

Technology

HEZU
16.8%
IVV
37.2%

Consumer Cyclical

HEZU
7.9%
IVV
8.9%

Utilities

HEZU
6.5%
IVV
2.6%

Healthcare

HEZU
5.8%
IVV
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

HEZU
5.5%
IVV
4.8%

Communication Services

HEZU
3.9%
IVV
9.6%

Basic Materials

HEZU
3.9%
IVV
1.8%

Energy

HEZU
3.5%
IVV
3.3%

Real Estate

HEZU
0.8%
IVV
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HEZU vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HEZU
HEZU Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
HEZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEZU Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
HEZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEZU Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HEZU vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF (HEZU) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HEZUIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.33

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

2.64

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.27

11.23

-0.96

HEZU vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEZU Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEZU and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HEZU vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEZU drawdown since its inception was -38.80%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEZU and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HEZUIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.80%

-55.25%

+16.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.95%

-8.89%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.83%

-18.75%

+3.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.79%

-24.53%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.80%

-33.90%

-4.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.77%

-10.72%

+4.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

2.08%

+0.72%

Volatility

HEZU vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF (HEZU) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 3.81%. This indicates that HEZU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HEZUIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

3.81%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.52%

10.27%

+3.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.65%

12.87%

+2.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.62%

17.03%

-0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.15%

18.07%

+0.08%

HEZU vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEZU has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

HEZU vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

HEZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than IVV's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HEZU
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF
2.54%2.92%2.77%2.52%23.26%2.25%2.32%5.40%3.48%1.92%3.11%2.68%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.08%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


HEZU and IVV have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HEZU has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to IVV (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEZU dropped -38.80% vs IVV's -55.25%.

On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.14% vs 12.50% for HEZU. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.14% return vs 12.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for HEZU.

HEZU has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 1.08% for IVV.

HEZU is categorized as Europe Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. HEZU tracks MSCI EMU 100% USD Hedged Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for HEZU and 0.03% for IVV.

HEZU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HEZU and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer