HEWB.TO vs. KNGC.TO
HEWB.TO (Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF) and KNGC.TO (Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF) are both Canada Equities funds - HEWB.TO tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index while KNGC.TO tracks the Brompton Index One Canadian Cash Flow Kings Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, HEWB.TO returned 70.17% vs 38.33% for KNGC.TO. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HEWB.TO charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for KNGC.TO.
Performance
HEWB.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEWB.TO achieves a 33.45% return, which is significantly higher than KNGC.TO's 14.73% return.
HEWB.TO
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 6.47%
- 6M
- 31.58%
- YTD
- 33.45%
- 1Y
- 70.17%
- 3Y*
- 36.57%
- 5Y*
- 21.03%
- 10Y*
- —
KNGC.TO
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- 6M
- 11.08%
- YTD
- 14.73%
- 1Y
- 38.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HEWB.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HEWB.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF | 33.45% | 43.48% | 19.63% |
KNGC.TO Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF | 14.73% | 41.07% | -4.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEWB.TO and KNGC.TO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2024 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEWB.TO vs. KNGC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HEWB.TO
KNGC.TO
HEWB.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF (HEWB.TO) and Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HEWB.TO | KNGC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.94 | 1.60 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.87 | 6.79 | +1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 35.70 | 23.80 | +11.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HEWB.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEWB.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.43%, which is greater than KNGC.TO's maximum drawdown of -25.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEWB.TO and KNGC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEWB.TO | KNGC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.43% | -25.52% | -13.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.97% | -5.67% | -3.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -4.38% | +4.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.17% | -4.63% | -2.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 1.61% | +0.36% |
Volatility
HEWB.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF (HEWB.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO) at 3.66%. This indicates that HEWB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNGC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEWB.TO | KNGC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | 3.66% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.85% | 9.57% | +2.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.51% | 12.68% | +0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.10% | 17.63% | -3.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.24% | 17.63% | +1.61% |
HEWB.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEWB.TO has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than KNGC.TO's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEWB.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Dividend Comparison
HEWB.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KNGC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HEWB.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KNGC.TO Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF | 1.62% | 1.69% | 0.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEWB.TO and KNGC.TO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KNGC.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KNGC.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for HEWB.TO.
HEWB.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index, while KNGC.TO tracks Brompton Index One Canadian Cash Flow Kings Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Brompton. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for HEWB.TO and 0.17% for KNGC.TO.
Find the right allocation for HEWB.TO and KNGC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer