HERU.L vs. LCCN.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HERU.L (Global X Video Games & Esports UCITS ETF Acc USD) and LCCN.L (Lyxor MSCI China UCITS ETF - Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - HERU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while LCCN.L is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HERU.L returned -4.95%/yr vs -4.89%/yr for LCCN.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HERU.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for LCCN.L.

Performance

HERU.L vs. LCCN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Video Games & Esports UCITS ETF Acc USD (HERU.L) and Lyxor MSCI China UCITS ETF - Acc (LCCN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HERU.L achieves a -14.21% return, which is significantly lower than LCCN.L's -7.04% return.

HERU.L

• 1D: -1.65%
• 1M: -4.54%
• YTD: -14.21%
• 6M: -16.08%
• 1Y: -15.16%
• 3Y*: 8.14%
• 5Y*: -4.95%
• 10Y*: —

LCCN.L

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -2.64%
• YTD: -7.04%
• 6M: -8.41%
• 1Y: 5.00%
• 3Y*: 11.02%
• 5Y*: -4.89%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HERU.L vs. LCCN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HERU.L Global X Video Games & Esports UCITS ETF Acc USD	-14.21%	24.71%	18.11%	6.15%	-35.25%	-9.81%	1.78%
LCCN.L Lyxor MSCI China UCITS ETF - Acc	-7.04%	32.04%	19.37%	-11.61%	-22.21%	-21.87%	2.12%

Correlation

The correlation between HERU.L and LCCN.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2020	0.56

The correlation between HERU.L and LCCN.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

HERU.L vs. LCCN.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HERU.L	LCCN.L
Communication Services	93.7%	18.8%
Technology	4.5%	9.6%
Industrials	1.9%	5.0%
Basic Materials	-	5.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	26.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	3.2%
Energy	-	3.7%
Financial Services	-	19.1%
Healthcare	-	5.4%
Real Estate	-	1.5%
Utilities	-	1.7%

Return for Risk

HERU.L vs. LCCN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HERU.L

HERU.L Risk / Return Rank: 3
HERU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
HERU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
HERU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3
HERU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
HERU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4

LCCN.L

LCCN.L Risk / Return Rank: 13
LCCN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
LCCN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
LCCN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 13
LCCN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
LCCN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HERU.L vs. LCCN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Video Games & Esports UCITS ETF Acc USD (HERU.L) and Lyxor MSCI China UCITS ETF - Acc (LCCN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HERU.L	LCCN.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.79	0.25	-1.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.01	0.50	-1.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	1.06	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.58	0.29	-0.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.08	0.61	-1.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HERU.L vs. LCCN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HERU.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is lower than the LCCN.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HERU.L and LCCN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HERU.L	LCCN.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.79	0.25	-1.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.24	-0.17	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.19	0.11	-0.31

Drawdowns

HERU.L vs. LCCN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HERU.L drawdown since its inception was -55.72%, smaller than the maximum LCCN.L drawdown of -62.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERU.L and LCCN.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HERU.L	LCCN.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.72%	-62.38%	+6.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.06%	-16.98%	-9.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.06%	-25.52%	-0.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.79%	-56.10%	+7.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.58%	-34.07%	-0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.97%	-30.16%	-3.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.96%	8.15%	+5.81%

Volatility

HERU.L vs. LCCN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Video Games & Esports UCITS ETF Acc USD (HERU.L) is 5.76%, while Lyxor MSCI China UCITS ETF - Acc (LCCN.L) has a volatility of 8.04%. This indicates that HERU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCCN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HERU.L	LCCN.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.76%	8.04%	-2.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.54%	14.66%	+0.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.26%	20.12%	-0.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.53%	29.33%	-5.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.67%	27.88%	-4.21%

HERU.L vs. LCCN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HERU.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LCCN.L's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

HERU.L vs. LCCN.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HERU.L nor LCCN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HERU.L and LCCN.L in my portfolio?

HERU.L and LCCN.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HERU.L or LCCN.L?

On fees, LCCN.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HERU.L or LCCN.L?

LCCN.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HERU.L.

What is the main difference between HERU.L and LCCN.L?

HERU.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while LCCN.L is China Equities. HERU.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while LCCN.L tracks MSCI China NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HERU.L and 0.29% for LCCN.L.