HERIX vs. GLLSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Hartford Emerging Markets Equity Fund (HERIX) and abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX).
HERIX is managed by Hartford. It was launched on May 30, 2011. GLLSX is managed by Aberdeen. It was launched on Aug 29, 2000.
Performance
HERIX vs. GLLSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HERIX vs. GLLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERIX Hartford Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 2.88% | 29.11% | 10.97% | 16.56% | -21.76% | 5.58% | 10.12% | 18.67% | -16.04% | 41.83% |
GLLSX abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 5.47% | 34.81% | 0.73% | 21.35% | -23.04% | 36.50% | 15.93% | 23.64% | -11.50% | 23.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HERIX achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly lower than GLLSX's 5.47% return. Over the past 10 years, HERIX has underperformed GLLSX with an annualized return of 8.95%, while GLLSX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.57% annualized return.
HERIX
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -11.86%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 6.33%
- 1Y
- 28.43%
- 3Y*
- 17.27%
- 5Y*
- 5.84%
- 10Y*
- 8.95%
GLLSX
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -13.34%
- YTD
- 5.47%
- 6M
- 15.81%
- 1Y
- 48.29%
- 3Y*
- 17.69%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 11.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HERIX vs. GLLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HERIX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is lower than GLLSX's 1.23% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HERIX vs. GLLSX — Risk / Return Rank
HERIX
GLLSX
HERIX vs. GLLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Emerging Markets Equity Fund (HERIX) and abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HERIX | GLLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.62 | 2.46 | -0.84 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.11 | 3.02 | -0.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.46 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 3.15 | -1.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.65 | 13.47 | -5.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HERIX | GLLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62 | 2.46 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.71 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.67 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.55 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between HERIX and GLLSX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HERIX vs. GLLSX - Dividend Comparison
HERIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, more than GLLSX's 1.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERIX Hartford Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 5.22% | 5.37% | 0.00% | 3.82% | 3.73% | 2.17% | 1.14% | 3.16% | 2.26% | 1.57% | 1.44% | 4.09% |
GLLSX abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 1.78% | 1.88% | 0.74% | 0.77% | 29.32% | 22.85% | 0.00% | 3.38% | 9.47% | 8.40% | 1.09% | 0.94% |
Drawdowns
HERIX vs. GLLSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HERIX drawdown since its inception was -39.70%, which is greater than GLLSX's maximum drawdown of -32.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERIX and GLLSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HERIX | GLLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.70% | -32.59% | -7.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.78% | -14.39% | +1.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.55% | -30.02% | -5.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.70% | -32.59% | -7.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.78% | -14.39% | +1.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.77% | -7.99% | -4.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 3.36% | +0.02% |
Volatility
HERIX vs. GLLSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford Emerging Markets Equity Fund (HERIX) is 8.55%, while abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX) has a volatility of 10.78%. This indicates that HERIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HERIX | GLLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.55% | 10.78% | -2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.28% | 15.60% | -2.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.40% | 19.51% | -2.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.08% | 17.21% | -1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 17.34% | -0.06% |