PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HEQT vs. PHDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HEQT vs. PHDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT) and Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEQT achieves a 4.76% return, which is significantly lower than PHDG's 10.56% return.


HEQT

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.57%
YTD
4.76%
6M
4.67%
1Y
14.00%
3Y*
13.21%
5Y*
10Y*

PHDG

1D
-0.33%
1M
-1.88%
YTD
10.56%
6M
10.62%
1Y
21.44%
3Y*
9.78%
5Y*
4.89%
10Y*
7.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEQT vs. PHDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HEQT
Simplify Hedged Equity ETF
4.76%10.08%18.30%16.61%-8.25%2.11%
PHDG
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF
10.56%2.72%10.95%8.18%-14.09%3.31%

Correlation

The correlation between HEQT and PHDG is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2021

0.60

The correlation between HEQT and PHDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HEQT vs. PHDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEQT
HEQT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
HEQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEQT Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
HEQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEQT Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

PHDG
PHDG Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PHDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHDG Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
PHDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHDG Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEQT vs. PHDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT) and Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HEQTPHDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.39

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

3.93

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.50

17.30

-4.80

HEQT vs. PHDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEQT Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the PHDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEQT and PHDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HEQT vs. PHDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEQT drawdown since its inception was -11.51%, smaller than the maximum PHDG drawdown of -17.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEQT and PHDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HEQTPHDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.51%

-17.70%

+6.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.09%

-5.48%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.57%

-14.78%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-5.01%

+4.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.77%

-6.23%

+3.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

1.24%

-0.12%

Volatility

HEQT vs. PHDG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT) is 1.92%, while Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) has a volatility of 7.74%. This indicates that HEQT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HEQTPHDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.92%

7.74%

-5.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.47%

9.73%

-4.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.61%

11.39%

-4.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.47%

11.40%

-2.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.47%

12.15%

-3.68%

HEQT vs. PHDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEQT has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than PHDG's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

HEQT vs. PHDG - Dividend Comparison

HEQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than PHDG's 2.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HEQT
Simplify Hedged Equity ETF
1.20%1.19%1.29%4.10%3.94%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PHDG
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF
2.28%2.10%1.94%1.93%1.35%0.44%0.63%1.80%1.56%1.83%2.29%1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


HEQT and PHDG have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PHDG has higher volatility (7.74%) compared to HEQT (1.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEQT dropped -11.51% vs PHDG's -17.70%.

On 3-year performance, HEQT leads with 13.21% vs 9.78% for PHDG. On fees, PHDG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, HEQT has been the lower-risk option at 1.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HEQT has performed better with a 13.21% return vs 9.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PHDG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for HEQT.

PHDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 1.20% for HEQT.

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for HEQT and 0.39% for PHDG.

HEQT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HEQT and PHDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer