HEQT vs. IVVB
HEQT (Simplify Hedged Equity ETF) and IVVB (iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HEQT returned 14.78% vs 14.71% for IVVB. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HEQT charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IVVB.
Performance
HEQT vs. IVVB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEQT achieves a 4.92% return, which is significantly higher than IVVB's 4.66% return.
HEQT
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 1.33%
- YTD
- 4.92%
- 6M
- 5.48%
- 1Y
- 14.78%
- 3Y*
- 13.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVVB
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 4.66%
- 6M
- 4.54%
- 1Y
- 14.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HEQT vs. IVVB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HEQT Simplify Hedged Equity ETF | 4.92% | 10.08% | 18.30% | 5.37% |
IVVB iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF | 4.66% | 9.60% | 18.66% | 2.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEQT and IVVB is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2023 | 0.88 |
The correlation between HEQT and IVVB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
HEQT vs. IVVB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HEQT
IVVB
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
HEQT
IVVB
Financial Services
HEQT
IVVB
Communication Services
HEQT
IVVB
Consumer Cyclical
HEQT
IVVB
Healthcare
HEQT
IVVB
Industrials
HEQT
IVVB
Consumer Defensive
HEQT
IVVB
Energy
HEQT
IVVB
Utilities
HEQT
IVVB
Real Estate
HEQT
IVVB
Basic Materials
HEQT
IVVB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEQT vs. IVVB — Risk / Return Rank
HEQT
IVVB
HEQT vs. IVVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT) and iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HEQT | IVVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.39 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 2.57 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.35 | 11.04 | +2.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HEQT | IVVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 2.03 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 1.31 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
HEQT vs. IVVB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEQT drawdown since its inception was -11.51%, smaller than the maximum IVVB drawdown of -13.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEQT and IVVB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEQT | IVVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.51% | -13.08% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.09% | -5.75% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -0.07% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.79% | -1.60% | -1.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.11% | 1.34% | -0.23% |
Volatility
HEQT vs. IVVB - Volatility Comparison
Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT) has a higher volatility of 0.73% compared to iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB) at 0.69%. This indicates that HEQT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVVB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEQT | IVVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.73% | 0.69% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.27% | 5.49% | -0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.38% | 7.26% | -0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.47% | 9.27% | -0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.47% | 9.27% | -0.80% |
HEQT vs. IVVB - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEQT has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than IVVB's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEQT vs. IVVB - Dividend Comparison
HEQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than IVVB's 1.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEQT Simplify Hedged Equity ETF | 1.19% | 1.19% | 1.29% | 4.10% | 3.94% | 0.27% |
IVVB iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF | 1.17% | 1.22% | 0.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEQT and IVVB have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HEQT has higher volatility (0.73%) compared to IVVB (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEQT dropped -11.51% vs IVVB's -13.08%.
On 1-year performance, HEQT leads with 14.78% vs 14.71% for IVVB. On fees, IVVB is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HEQT has performed better with a 14.78% return vs 14.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVVB is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for HEQT.
HEQT has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 1.17% for IVVB.
They also come from different issuers: Simplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for HEQT and 0.50% for IVVB.
HEQT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HEQT and IVVB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer