HEQT vs. HELO
HEQT (Simplify Hedged Equity ETF) and HELO (JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HEQT returned 13.83% vs 10.13% for HELO. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HEQT charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HELO.
Performance
HEQT vs. HELO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEQT achieves a 3.98% return, which is significantly higher than HELO's 1.45% return.
HEQT
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 3.98%
- 6M
- 4.47%
- 1Y
- 13.83%
- 3Y*
- 12.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HELO
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- 1.45%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 10.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HEQT vs. HELO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HEQT Simplify Hedged Equity ETF | 3.98% | 10.08% | 18.30% | 6.93% |
HELO JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 1.45% | 7.82% | 18.05% | 6.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEQT and HELO is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023 | 0.87 |
The correlation between HEQT and HELO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
HEQT vs. HELO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HEQT
HELO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
HEQT
HELO
Financial Services
HEQT
HELO
Communication Services
HEQT
HELO
Consumer Cyclical
HEQT
HELO
Healthcare
HEQT
HELO
Industrials
HEQT
HELO
Consumer Defensive
HEQT
HELO
Energy
HEQT
HELO
Utilities
HEQT
HELO
Real Estate
HEQT
HELO
Basic Materials
HEQT
HELO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEQT vs. HELO — Risk / Return Rank
HEQT
HELO
HEQT vs. HELO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HEQT | HELO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.32 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 1.77 | +0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.47 | 7.80 | +4.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HEQT | HELO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | 1.63 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.06 | 1.58 | -0.53 |
Drawdowns
HEQT vs. HELO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEQT drawdown since its inception was -11.51%, which is greater than HELO's maximum drawdown of -10.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEQT and HELO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEQT | HELO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.51% | -10.89% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.09% | -5.76% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | -1.12% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.79% | -1.18% | -1.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.11% | 1.30% | -0.19% |
Volatility
HEQT vs. HELO - Volatility Comparison
Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT) has a higher volatility of 1.20% compared to JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) at 1.02%. This indicates that HEQT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HELO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEQT | HELO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.20% | 1.02% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.35% | 5.06% | +0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.45% | 6.26% | +0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.48% | 7.96% | +0.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.48% | 7.96% | +0.52% |
HEQT vs. HELO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEQT has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than HELO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEQT vs. HELO - Dividend Comparison
HEQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, more than HELO's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HELO JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 0.63% | 0.67% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HEQT Simplify Hedged Equity ETF | 1.20% | 1.19% | 1.29% | 4.10% | 3.94% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEQT and HELO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HEQT has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to HELO (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEQT dropped -11.51% vs HELO's -10.89%.
On 1-year performance, HEQT leads with 13.83% vs 10.13% for HELO. On fees, HELO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, HELO has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HEQT has performed better with a 13.83% return vs 10.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HELO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for HEQT.
HEQT has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.63% for HELO.
They also come from different issuers: Simplify and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for HEQT and 0.50% for HELO.
HEQT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HEQT and HELO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer