PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HELS vs. LSEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HELS vs. LSEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF (HELS) and Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HELS achieves a -2.32% return, which is significantly lower than LSEQ's 24.01% return.


HELS

1D
-3.38%
1M
-2.04%
YTD
-2.32%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LSEQ

1D
-2.55%
1M
-1.16%
YTD
24.01%
6M
23.99%
1Y
22.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HELS vs. LSEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HELS
Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF
-2.32%-2.83%
LSEQ
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF
24.01%-1.76%

Correlation

The correlation between HELS and LSEQ is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025

0.58

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HELS vs. LSEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HELS

LSEQ
LSEQ Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
LSEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
LSEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HELS vs. LSEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF (HELS) and Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HELS vs. LSEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HELSLSEQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.63

1.10

-1.72

Drawdowns

HELS vs. LSEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HELS drawdown since its inception was -13.60%, which is greater than LSEQ's maximum drawdown of -8.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HELS and LSEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HELSLSEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.60%

-8.35%

-5.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.47%

-4.27%

-4.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.58%

-3.23%

-2.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

Volatility

HELS vs. LSEQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HELSLSEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.66%

15.27%

+1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.66%

14.39%

+2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.66%

14.39%

+2.27%

HELS vs. LSEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HELS has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than LSEQ's 1.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

HELS vs. LSEQ - Dividend Comparison

HELS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than LSEQ's 1.78% yield.


PositionTTM2025
HELS
Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF
0.02%0.02%
LSEQ
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF
1.78%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


HELS and LSEQ have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HELS is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HELS is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.70% for LSEQ.

LSEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 0.02% for HELS.

They also come from different issuers: Hedgeye and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for HELS and 1.70% for LSEQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HELS and LSEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer