HELO vs. BBUS
HELO (JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) and BBUS (JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HELO is a Options Trading fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while BBUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. HELO is actively managed, while BBUS is passively managed. Over the past year, HELO returned 11.08% vs 27.47% for BBUS. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HELO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
HELO vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HELO achieves a 2.31% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 10.60% return.
HELO
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 2.31%
- 6M
- 2.92%
- 1Y
- 11.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 27.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- —
HELO vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HELO JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 2.31% | 7.82% | 18.05% | 6.30% |
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 10.60% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 11.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between HELO and BBUS is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023 | 0.92 |
The correlation between HELO and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
HELO vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HELO
BBUS
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
HELO
BBUS
Consumer Cyclical
HELO
BBUS
Communication Services
HELO
BBUS
Financial Services
HELO
BBUS
Healthcare
HELO
BBUS
Industrials
HELO
BBUS
Consumer Defensive
HELO
BBUS
Energy
HELO
BBUS
Utilities
HELO
BBUS
Real Estate
HELO
BBUS
Basic Materials
HELO
BBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HELO vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
HELO
BBUS
HELO vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HELO | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.42 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 3.00 | -1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.55 | 13.76 | -5.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HELO | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 2.33 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.64 | 0.84 | +0.80 |
Drawdowns
HELO vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HELO drawdown since its inception was -10.89%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HELO and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HELO | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.89% | -35.35% | +24.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.76% | -9.21% | +3.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -0.74% | +0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.18% | -5.46% | +4.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.30% | 2.00% | -0.70% |
Volatility
HELO vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) is 0.70%, while JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) has a volatility of 2.88%. This indicates that HELO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HELO | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.70% | 2.88% | -2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.99% | 8.96% | -3.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.21% | 11.87% | -5.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.96% | 17.03% | -9.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.96% | 19.59% | -11.63% |
HELO vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
HELO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
HELO vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
HELO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than BBUS's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% |
HELO JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 0.62% | 0.67% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, HELO and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BBUS has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to HELO (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HELO dropped -10.89% vs BBUS's -35.35%.
On 1-year performance, BBUS leads with 27.47% vs 11.08% for HELO. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, HELO has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 27.47% return vs 11.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HELO.
BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.62% for HELO.
HELO is categorized as Options Trading, while BBUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HELO and 0.02% for BBUS.
BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HELO and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer