HEFT vs. MKTN
HEFT (Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF) and MKTN (Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
HEFT vs. MKTN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEFT achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly higher than MKTN's 0.96% return.
HEFT
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 2.98%
- YTD
- 7.87%
- 6M
- 7.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MKTN
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 3.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HEFT vs. MKTN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF | 7.87% | 0.98% |
MKTN Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral ETF | 0.96% | 1.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEFT and MKTN is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEFT vs. MKTN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF (HEFT) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral ETF (MKTN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HEFT | MKTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.43 | 0.98 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
HEFT vs. MKTN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEFT drawdown since its inception was -9.17%, which is greater than MKTN's maximum drawdown of -4.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEFT and MKTN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEFT | MKTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.17% | -4.13% | -5.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.68% | -0.96% | -1.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.12% | -1.13% | -1.99% |
Volatility
HEFT vs. MKTN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEFT | MKTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.48% | 6.80% | +5.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.48% | 6.80% | +5.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.48% | 6.80% | +5.68% |
Dividends
HEFT vs. MKTN - Dividend Comparison
HEFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than MKTN's 0.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% |
MKTN Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral ETF | 0.51% | 0.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEFT and MKTN have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MKTN has the higher dividend yield at 0.51%, compared with 0.02% for HEFT.
They also come from different issuers: Hedgeye and Federated Hermes.
Find the right allocation for HEFT and MKTN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer