PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HEFA vs. BUFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HEFA vs. BUFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA) and Buffalo International Fund (BUFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEFA achieves a 10.24% return, which is significantly lower than BUFIX's 17.99% return. Over the past 10 years, HEFA has outperformed BUFIX with an annualized return of 12.60%, while BUFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.25% annualized return.


HEFA

1D
-0.45%
1M
4.65%
YTD
10.24%
6M
12.49%
1Y
25.95%
3Y*
18.32%
5Y*
13.52%
10Y*
12.60%

BUFIX

1D
0.14%
1M
9.77%
YTD
17.99%
6M
20.64%
1Y
21.31%
3Y*
11.99%
5Y*
6.13%
10Y*
10.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEFA vs. BUFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HEFA
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF
10.24%24.58%13.71%20.33%-4.86%19.59%2.09%27.63%-9.33%16.67%
BUFIX
Buffalo International Fund
17.99%17.09%-1.90%18.33%-21.80%18.20%19.10%28.01%-8.85%29.33%

Correlation

The correlation between HEFA and BUFIX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2014

0.78

The correlation between HEFA and BUFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HEFA vs. BUFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEFA
HEFA Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
HEFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEFA Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
HEFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEFA Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFIX
BUFIX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
BUFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEFA vs. BUFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA) and Buffalo International Fund (BUFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HEFABUFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.23

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

1.62

+1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.43

5.65

+5.78

HEFA vs. BUFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEFA Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the BUFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEFA and BUFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HEFABUFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

1.22

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

0.35

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.59

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.34

+0.33

Drawdowns

HEFA vs. BUFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEFA drawdown since its inception was -32.39%, smaller than the maximum BUFIX drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEFA and BUFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HEFABUFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.39%

-55.09%

+22.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.52%

-12.85%

+3.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.28%

-15.52%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.79%

-34.93%

+20.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.39%

-34.93%

+2.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

0.00%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-9.17%

+5.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

3.68%

-1.40%

Volatility

HEFA vs. BUFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA) is 4.05%, while Buffalo International Fund (BUFIX) has a volatility of 7.04%. This indicates that HEFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HEFABUFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

7.04%

-2.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.13%

14.72%

-4.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.59%

17.12%

-4.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.76%

17.56%

-3.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.86%

17.52%

-1.66%

HEFA vs. BUFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEFA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFIX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

HEFA vs. BUFIX - Dividend Comparison

HEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, more than BUFIX's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFIX
Buffalo International Fund
0.72%0.85%0.84%0.59%1.85%1.20%0.28%0.57%2.42%0.36%0.00%0.51%
HEFA
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF
3.99%4.40%3.09%3.02%25.14%3.06%2.10%7.56%4.58%2.55%3.17%3.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


HEFA and BUFIX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUFIX has higher volatility (7.04%) compared to HEFA (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEFA dropped -32.39% vs BUFIX's -55.09%.

HEFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HEFA and BUFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer