PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HEEM vs. SOXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HEEM vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEEM achieves a 20.85% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 79.35% return. Over the past 10 years, HEEM has underperformed SOXX with an annualized return of 10.40%, while SOXX has yielded a comparatively higher 33.92% annualized return.


HEEM

1D
-5.76%
1M
-2.36%
YTD
20.85%
6M
21.68%
1Y
50.37%
3Y*
23.65%
5Y*
8.78%
10Y*
10.40%

SOXX

1D
-10.44%
1M
6.49%
YTD
79.35%
6M
74.82%
1Y
151.62%
3Y*
50.81%
5Y*
31.00%
10Y*
33.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEEM vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HEEM
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
20.85%34.02%12.59%10.14%-16.85%-1.82%17.94%18.53%-11.09%27.59%
SOXX
iShares Semiconductor ETF
79.35%40.74%12.92%67.12%-35.09%44.09%52.72%62.42%-6.49%39.79%

Correlation

The correlation between HEEM and SOXX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2014

0.63

The correlation between HEEM and SOXX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (5 years) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HEEM vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HEEM
SOXX

Technology

37.0%
100.0%

Financial Services

19.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%

-

Industrials

7.5%

-

Communication Services

6.9%

-

Basic Materials

6.5%

-

Energy

4.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.0%

-

Healthcare

2.9%

-

Utilities

2.1%

-

Real Estate

1.1%

-

Technology

HEEM
37.0%
SOXX
100.0%

Financial Services

HEEM
19.4%
SOXX

-

Consumer Cyclical

HEEM
9.6%
SOXX

-

Industrials

HEEM
7.5%
SOXX

-

Communication Services

HEEM
6.9%
SOXX

-

Basic Materials

HEEM
6.5%
SOXX

-

Energy

HEEM
4.0%
SOXX

-

Consumer Defensive

HEEM
3.0%
SOXX

-

Healthcare

HEEM
2.9%
SOXX

-

Utilities

HEEM
2.1%
SOXX

-

Real Estate

HEEM
1.1%
SOXX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HEEM vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEEM
HEEM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
HEEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
HEEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXX
SOXX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SOXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEEM vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HEEMSOXXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.61

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.67

9.68

-5.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.40

36.37

-17.97

HEEM vs. SOXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is lower than the SOXX Sharpe Ratio of 4.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEEM and SOXX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HEEMSOXXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

4.25

-1.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.86

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

1.01

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.43

+0.02

Drawdowns

HEEM vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEEM drawdown since its inception was -33.53%, smaller than the maximum SOXX drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEEM and SOXX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HEEMSOXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.53%

-70.21%

+36.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.83%

-15.77%

+4.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.82%

-41.36%

+26.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.60%

-45.75%

+15.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.53%

-45.75%

+12.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.80%

-12.33%

+4.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.13%

-19.97%

+8.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

4.19%

-1.44%

Volatility

HEEM vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) is 9.48%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 17.99%. This indicates that HEEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HEEMSOXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.48%

17.99%

-8.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.57%

29.75%

-13.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.71%

35.87%

-17.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.21%

36.40%

-19.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.06%

33.60%

-15.54%

HEEM vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEEM has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

HEEM vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison

HEEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than SOXX's 0.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HEEM
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
3.29%3.98%2.38%2.75%7.49%1.93%1.49%3.04%2.37%2.05%1.84%6.28%
SOXX
iShares Semiconductor ETF
0.31%0.57%0.67%0.78%1.26%0.64%0.81%1.23%1.37%0.90%1.08%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


HEEM and SOXX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXX has higher volatility (17.99%) compared to HEEM (9.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEEM dropped -33.53% vs SOXX's -70.21%.

On 10-year performance, SOXX leads with 33.92% vs 10.40% for HEEM. On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, HEEM has been the lower-risk option at 9.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 33.92% return vs 10.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for HEEM.

HEEM has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 0.31% for SOXX.

HEEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while SOXX is Semiconductors. HEEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets 100% USD Hedged Index, while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for HEEM and 0.34% for SOXX.

SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.25 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HEEM and SOXX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer