PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HEEM vs. EMEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HEEM vs. EMEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HEEM vs. EMEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEEM achieves a 6.27% return, which is significantly lower than EMEQ's 14.16% return.


HEEM

1D
0.05%
1M
-5.89%
YTD
6.27%
6M
12.41%
1Y
36.71%
3Y*
19.01%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*
9.14%

EMEQ

1D
1.75%
1M
-10.65%
YTD
14.16%
6M
30.81%
1Y
82.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HEEM vs. EMEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEEM has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than EMEQ's 0.86% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HEEM vs. EMEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEEM
HEEM Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
HEEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEEM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
HEEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEEM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

EMEQ
EMEQ Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
EMEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
EMEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEEM vs. EMEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HEEMEMEQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.11

2.78

-0.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.77

3.27

-0.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.48

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

4.68

-1.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.65

18.73

-6.08

HEEM vs. EMEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the EMEQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEEM and EMEQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HEEMEMEQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

2.78

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

1.88

-1.48

Correlation

The correlation between HEEM and EMEQ is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

HEEM vs. EMEQ - Dividend Comparison

HEEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than EMEQ's 2.42% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HEEM
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
3.74%3.98%2.38%2.75%7.49%1.93%1.49%3.04%2.37%2.05%1.84%6.28%
EMEQ
Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.42%2.76%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HEEM vs. EMEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEEM drawdown since its inception was -33.53%, which is greater than EMEQ's maximum drawdown of -19.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEEM and EMEQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HEEMEMEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.53%

-19.99%

-13.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.40%

-17.91%

+6.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.59%

-12.88%

+5.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.28%

-4.09%

-7.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

4.47%

-1.54%

Volatility

HEEM vs. EMEQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) is 7.65%, while Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) has a volatility of 15.38%. This indicates that HEEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HEEMEMEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.65%

15.38%

-7.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.24%

23.91%

-10.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.52%

29.87%

-12.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.54%

27.51%

-10.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.75%

27.51%

-9.76%