PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HEEM vs. BITI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HEEM vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEEM achieves a 20.28% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 28.75% return.


HEEM

1D
-3.79%
1M
-4.46%
6M
13.12%
YTD
20.28%
1Y
43.38%
3Y*
22.40%
5Y*
9.06%
10Y*
10.05%

BITI

1D
2.65%
1M
1.46%
6M
34.68%
YTD
28.75%
1Y
68.34%
3Y*
-30.65%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEEM vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HEEM
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
20.28%34.02%12.59%10.14%-2.38%
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
28.75%-1.76%-62.60%-66.17%3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between HEEM and BITI is -0.45, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022

-0.33

The correlation between HEEM and BITI shifts across timeframes, from -0.45 (1 year) to -0.31 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HEEM vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEEM
HEEM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
HEEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
HEEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

BITI
BITI Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEEM vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HEEMBITIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.26

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.03

2.72

+1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.50

6.78

+6.72

HEEM vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEEM and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HEEM vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEEM drawdown since its inception was -33.53%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEEM and BITI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HEEMBITIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.53%

-92.16%

+58.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.83%

-25.28%

+14.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.82%

-84.63%

+69.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.74%

-85.94%

+76.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.08%

-68.34%

+57.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.22%

10.11%

-6.89%

Volatility

HEEM vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) have volatilities of 11.44% and 11.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HEEMBITIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.44%

11.38%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.69%

34.25%

-14.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.64%

44.14%

-22.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.87%

52.28%

-34.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.29%

52.28%

-33.99%

HEEM vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEEM has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

HEEM vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

HEEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than BITI's 15.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
15.10%1.60%3.91%3.33%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HEEM
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
3.19%3.98%2.38%2.75%7.49%1.93%1.49%3.04%2.37%2.05%1.84%6.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


HEEM and BITI have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HEEM has higher volatility (11.44%) compared to BITI (11.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEEM dropped -33.53% vs BITI's -92.16%.

On 3-year performance, HEEM leads with 22.40% vs -30.65% for BITI. On fees, HEEM is cheaper at 0.72% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HEEM has performed better with a 22.40% return vs -30.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HEEM is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.10%, compared with 3.19% for HEEM.

HEEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. HEEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets 100% USD Hedged Index, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for HEEM and 1.03% for BITI.

HEEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HEEM and BITI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer