PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HECO vs. SPYA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HECO vs. SPYA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (HECO) and Twin Oak Endure ETF (SPYA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HECO achieves a 72.76% return, which is significantly higher than SPYA's 5.36% return.


HECO

1D
-1.40%
1M
12.83%
YTD
72.76%
6M
65.53%
1Y
136.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPYA

1D
-1.22%
1M
-1.58%
YTD
5.36%
6M
4.44%
1Y
16.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HECO vs. SPYA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HECO and SPYA is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025

0.68

The correlation between HECO and SPYA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HECO vs. SPYA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HECO
HECO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HECO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
HECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HECO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYA
SPYA Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SPYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYA Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYA Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HECO vs. SPYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (HECO) and Twin Oak Endure ETF (SPYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HECOSPYADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.24

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.52

1.71

+4.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.64

6.57

+12.07

HECO vs. SPYA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HECO Sharpe Ratio is 3.66, which is higher than the SPYA Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HECO and SPYA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HECO vs. SPYA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HECO drawdown since its inception was -44.59%, which is greater than SPYA's maximum drawdown of -9.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HECO and SPYA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HECOSPYADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.59%

-9.51%

-35.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.03%

-9.51%

-11.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-3.13%

+1.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.53%

-1.48%

-10.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.35%

2.47%

+4.88%

Volatility

HECO vs. SPYA - Volatility Comparison

State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (HECO) has a higher volatility of 10.26% compared to Twin Oak Endure ETF (SPYA) at 4.49%. This indicates that HECO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HECOSPYADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.26%

4.49%

+5.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.99%

9.29%

+19.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.49%

11.82%

+25.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.68%

11.64%

+33.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.68%

11.64%

+33.04%

HECO vs. SPYA - Expense Ratio Comparison

HECO has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYA's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

HECO vs. SPYA - Dividend Comparison

HECO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.


PositionTTM20252024
HECO
State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF
0.00%0.00%2.61%
SPYA
Twin Oak Endure ETF
0.36%0.37%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HECO and SPYA have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HECO has higher volatility (10.26%) compared to SPYA (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HECO dropped -44.59% vs SPYA's -9.51%.

On 1-year performance, HECO leads with 136.37% vs 16.21% for SPYA. On fees, SPYA is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, SPYA has been the lower-risk option at 4.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HECO has performed better with a 136.37% return vs 16.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYA is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for HECO.

SPYA has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for HECO.

HECO is categorized as Blockchain, while SPYA is Equity Hedged. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Twin Oak. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for HECO and 0.49% for SPYA.

HECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.66 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HECO and SPYA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer