HECO vs. SPYA
HECO (State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF) and SPYA (Twin Oak Endure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HECO is a Blockchain fund actively managed by State Street, while SPYA is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by Twin Oak. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HECO returned 136.37% vs 16.21% for SPYA. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HECO charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for SPYA.
Performance
HECO vs. SPYA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HECO achieves a 72.76% return, which is significantly higher than SPYA's 5.36% return.
HECO
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 12.83%
- YTD
- 72.76%
- 6M
- 65.53%
- 1Y
- 136.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYA
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- 4.44%
- 1Y
- 16.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HECO vs. SPYA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HECO State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF | 72.76% | 41.71% |
SPYA Twin Oak Endure ETF | 5.36% | 12.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between HECO and SPYA is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025 | 0.68 |
The correlation between HECO and SPYA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HECO vs. SPYA — Risk / Return Rank
HECO
SPYA
HECO vs. SPYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (HECO) and Twin Oak Endure ETF (SPYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HECO | SPYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.24 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.52 | 1.71 | +4.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.64 | 6.57 | +12.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HECO vs. SPYA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HECO drawdown since its inception was -44.59%, which is greater than SPYA's maximum drawdown of -9.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HECO and SPYA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HECO | SPYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.59% | -9.51% | -35.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.03% | -9.51% | -11.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -3.13% | +1.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.53% | -1.48% | -10.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.35% | 2.47% | +4.88% |
Volatility
HECO vs. SPYA - Volatility Comparison
State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (HECO) has a higher volatility of 10.26% compared to Twin Oak Endure ETF (SPYA) at 4.49%. This indicates that HECO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HECO | SPYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.26% | 4.49% | +5.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.99% | 9.29% | +19.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.49% | 11.82% | +25.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.68% | 11.64% | +33.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.68% | 11.64% | +33.04% |
HECO vs. SPYA - Expense Ratio Comparison
HECO has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYA's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
HECO vs. SPYA - Dividend Comparison
HECO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HECO State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.61% |
SPYA Twin Oak Endure ETF | 0.36% | 0.37% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HECO and SPYA have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HECO has higher volatility (10.26%) compared to SPYA (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HECO dropped -44.59% vs SPYA's -9.51%.
On 1-year performance, HECO leads with 136.37% vs 16.21% for SPYA. On fees, SPYA is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, SPYA has been the lower-risk option at 4.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HECO has performed better with a 136.37% return vs 16.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYA is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for HECO.
SPYA has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for HECO.
HECO is categorized as Blockchain, while SPYA is Equity Hedged. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Twin Oak. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for HECO and 0.49% for SPYA.
HECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.66 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HECO and SPYA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer