HECO vs. QGRD
HECO (State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF) and QGRD (Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HECO is a Blockchain fund actively managed by State Street, while QGRD is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by Horizon. Both are actively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HECO charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for QGRD.
Performance
HECO vs. QGRD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HECO achieves a 73.41% return, which is significantly higher than QGRD's 15.23% return.
HECO
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 37.18%
- YTD
- 73.41%
- 6M
- 61.98%
- 1Y
- 145.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QGRD
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 8.54%
- YTD
- 15.23%
- 6M
- 13.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HECO vs. QGRD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HECO State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF | 73.41% | 18.57% |
QGRD Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF | 15.23% | 8.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between HECO and QGRD is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HECO vs. QGRD — Risk / Return Rank
HECO
QGRD
HECO vs. QGRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (HECO) and Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF (QGRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HECO | QGRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.93 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.24 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.04 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.23 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HECO | QGRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.82 | 2.18 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
HECO vs. QGRD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HECO drawdown since its inception was -44.59%, which is greater than QGRD's maximum drawdown of -9.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HECO and QGRD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HECO | QGRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.59% | -9.41% | -35.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | 0.00% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.84% | -2.20% | -9.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.31% | — | — |
Volatility
HECO vs. QGRD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HECO | QGRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.02% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.50% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.30% | 12.95% | +24.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.98% | 12.95% | +32.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.98% | 12.95% | +32.03% |
HECO vs. QGRD - Expense Ratio Comparison
HECO has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRD's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
HECO vs. QGRD - Dividend Comparison
HECO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QGRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HECO State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.61% |
QGRD Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF | 1.36% | 1.57% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HECO and QGRD have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QGRD is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QGRD is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for HECO.
QGRD has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.00% for HECO.
HECO is categorized as Blockchain, while QGRD is Equity Hedged. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for HECO and 0.85% for QGRD.
Find the right allocation for HECO and QGRD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer