HECA vs. TFPN
HECA (Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF) and TFPN (Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF) are both Global Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HECA charges 1.02%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for TFPN.
Performance
HECA vs. TFPN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HECA achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly lower than TFPN's 27.12% return.
HECA
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 0.54%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TFPN
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 4.83%
- YTD
- 27.12%
- 6M
- 26.38%
- 1Y
- 45.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HECA vs. TFPN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HECA Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF | 0.54% | 12.83% |
TFPN Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF | 27.12% | 12.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between HECA and TFPN is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HECA vs. TFPN — Risk / Return Rank
HECA
TFPN
HECA vs. TFPN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF (HECA) and Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HECA | TFPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.18 | 0.83 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
HECA vs. TFPN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HECA drawdown since its inception was -11.81%, smaller than the maximum TFPN drawdown of -16.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HECA and TFPN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HECA | TFPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.81% | -16.72% | +4.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.80% | 0.00% | -9.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.18% | -4.88% | +1.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.14% | — |
Volatility
HECA vs. TFPN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HECA | TFPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.49% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.41% | 13.70% | -1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.41% | 12.52% | -0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.41% | 12.52% | -0.11% |
HECA vs. TFPN - Expense Ratio Comparison
HECA has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than TFPN's 1.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
HECA vs. TFPN - Dividend Comparison
HECA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, while TFPN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HECA Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF | 2.01% | 2.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TFPN Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 0.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HECA and TFPN have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HECA is cheaper at 1.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HECA is cheaper with a 1.02% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for TFPN.
HECA has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 0.00% for TFPN.
They also come from different issuers: Hedgeye and Tidal ETFs. Their fees differ too: 1.02% for HECA and 1.10% for TFPN.
Find the right allocation for HECA and TFPN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer