HECA vs. ELM
HECA (Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF) and ELM (Elm Market Navigator ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HECA is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Hedgeye, while ELM is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Elm. Both are actively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HECA charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for ELM.
Performance
HECA vs. ELM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HECA achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly lower than ELM's 7.56% return.
HECA
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- 0.22%
- 6M
- -0.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ELM
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 2.88%
- YTD
- 7.56%
- 6M
- 8.51%
- 1Y
- 19.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HECA vs. ELM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HECA Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF | 0.22% | 12.83% |
ELM Elm Market Navigator ETF | 7.56% | 8.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between HECA and ELM is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HECA vs. ELM — Risk / Return Rank
HECA
ELM
HECA vs. ELM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF (HECA) and Elm Market Navigator ETF (ELM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HECA | ELM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 1.49 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
HECA vs. ELM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HECA drawdown since its inception was -11.81%, which is greater than ELM's maximum drawdown of -9.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HECA and ELM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HECA | ELM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.81% | -9.02% | -2.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.09% | -0.58% | -9.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.15% | -1.32% | -1.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.81% | — |
Volatility
HECA vs. ELM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HECA | ELM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.44% | 9.38% | +3.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.44% | 10.27% | +2.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.44% | 10.27% | +2.17% |
HECA vs. ELM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HECA has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than ELM's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
HECA vs. ELM - Dividend Comparison
HECA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than ELM's 2.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ELM Elm Market Navigator ETF | 2.52% | 2.71% |
HECA Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF | 2.01% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HECA and ELM have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ELM is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ELM is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for HECA.
ELM has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 2.01% for HECA.
HECA is categorized as Global Allocation, while ELM is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Hedgeye and Elm. Their fees differ too: 1.02% for HECA and 0.24% for ELM.
Find the right allocation for HECA and ELM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer