HEB.TO vs. ZCN.TO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HEB.TO (Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF) and ZCN.TO (BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HEB.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index, while ZCN.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HEB.TO returned 37.74%/yr vs 25.01%/yr for ZCN.TO. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HEB.TO charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for ZCN.TO.

Performance

HEB.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HEB.TO) and BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEB.TO achieves a 30.59% return, which is significantly higher than ZCN.TO's 11.25% return.

HEB.TO

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 8.34%
• YTD: 30.59%
• 6M: 30.46%
• 1Y: 74.14%
• 3Y*: 37.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZCN.TO

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 1.58%
• YTD: 11.25%
• 6M: 10.21%
• 1Y: 34.30%
• 3Y*: 25.01%
• 5Y*: 14.77%
• 10Y*: 12.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEB.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HEB.TO Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF	30.59%	44.00%	23.55%	7.23%
ZCN.TO BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF	11.25%	31.51%	21.64%	5.89%

Correlation

The correlation between HEB.TO and ZCN.TO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2023	0.64

The correlation between HEB.TO and ZCN.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

HEB.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HEB.TO	ZCN.TO
Financial Services	100.0%	33.7%
Basic Materials	-	17.2%
Communication Services	-	1.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	3.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.9%
Energy	-	18.9%
Healthcare	-	0.1%
Industrials	-	10.2%
Real Estate	-	1.5%
Technology	-	6.7%
Utilities	-	3.3%

Return for Risk

HEB.TO vs. ZCN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEB.TO

HEB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 97
HEB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
HEB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
HEB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 98
HEB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
HEB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

ZCN.TO

ZCN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 81
ZCN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
ZCN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
ZCN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
ZCN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
ZCN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEB.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HEB.TO) and BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HEB.TO	ZCN.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.69	2.63	+3.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	7.56	3.39	+4.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.04	1.47	+0.57
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.54	3.70	+4.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	38.25	16.96	+21.29

HEB.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 5.69, which is higher than the ZCN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEB.TO and ZCN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HEB.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEB.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.77%, smaller than the maximum ZCN.TO drawdown of -37.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEB.TO and ZCN.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HEB.TO	ZCN.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.77%	-37.18%	+22.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.86%	-9.30%	+0.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.77%	-12.25%	-2.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.25%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.26%	+1.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.40%	-4.72%	+2.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.96%	2.03%	-0.07%

Volatility

HEB.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HEB.TO) is 3.75%, while BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that HEB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZCN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HEB.TO	ZCN.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.75%	4.21%	-0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.40%	10.71%	+0.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.30%	13.12%	+0.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.04%	13.18%	-0.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.04%	15.00%	-1.96%

HEB.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEB.TO has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than ZCN.TO's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

HEB.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Dividend Comparison

HEB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than ZCN.TO's 2.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HEB.TO Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF	2.60%	3.20%	4.24%	3.75%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZCN.TO BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF	2.02%	2.22%	2.78%	3.29%	3.27%	2.74%	3.24%	3.13%	3.16%	2.75%	2.86%	3.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HEB.TO and ZCN.TO in my portfolio?

HEB.TO and ZCN.TO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HEB.TO or ZCN.TO?

On fees, ZCN.TO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HEB.TO or ZCN.TO?

ZCN.TO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for HEB.TO.

What is the main difference between HEB.TO and ZCN.TO?

HEB.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while ZCN.TO is Canada Equities. HEB.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index, while ZCN.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for HEB.TO and 0.06% for ZCN.TO.