PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HEB.TO vs. BNKL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HEB.TO vs. BNKL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HEB.TO) and Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (BNKL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HEB.TO vs. BNKL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HEB.TO
Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF
1.58%44.00%23.58%8.75%
BNKL.TO
Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
0.85%55.98%29.92%9.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEB.TO achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly higher than BNKL.TO's 0.85% return.


HEB.TO

1D
2.50%
1M
-4.22%
YTD
1.58%
6M
14.53%
1Y
51.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BNKL.TO

1D
2.75%
1M
-5.36%
YTD
0.85%
6M
18.04%
1Y
65.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HEB.TO vs. BNKL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEB.TO has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BNKL.TO's 1.33% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HEB.TO vs. BNKL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEB.TO
HEB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
HEB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
HEB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

BNKL.TO
BNKL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BNKL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNKL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNKL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BNKL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNKL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEB.TO vs. BNKL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HEB.TO) and Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (BNKL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HEB.TOBNKL.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.84

4.07

-0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.89

4.99

-0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.74

1.76

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.92

6.20

-0.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

25.35

24.07

+1.28

HEB.TO vs. BNKL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.84, which is comparable to the BNKL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEB.TO and BNKL.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HEB.TOBNKL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.84

4.07

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.01

2.22

-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between HEB.TO and BNKL.TO is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

HEB.TO vs. BNKL.TO - Dividend Comparison

HEB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, less than BNKL.TO's 3.16% yield.


TTM202520242023
HEB.TO
Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF
2.97%3.20%4.24%3.75%
BNKL.TO
Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
3.16%3.40%4.39%2.79%

Drawdowns

HEB.TO vs. BNKL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEB.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.82%, smaller than the maximum BNKL.TO drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEB.TO and BNKL.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HEB.TOBNKL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.82%

-18.58%

+3.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.86%

-10.79%

+1.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.09%

-8.04%

+1.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.51%

-3.17%

+0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

2.78%

-0.71%

Volatility

HEB.TO vs. BNKL.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HEB.TO) is 6.09%, while Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (BNKL.TO) has a volatility of 6.63%. This indicates that HEB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNKL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HEB.TOBNKL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.09%

6.63%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.25%

11.97%

-1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.52%

16.18%

-2.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.68%

15.69%

-3.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.68%

15.69%

-3.01%