HEB.TO vs. LMAX.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HEB.TO) and Hamilton Healthcare Yield Maximizer ETF (LMAX.TO).
HEB.TO and LMAX.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HEB.TO is a passively managed fund by Hamilton that tracks the performance of the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2023. LMAX.TO is an actively managed fund by Hamilton. It was launched on Feb 6, 2024.
Performance
HEB.TO vs. LMAX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HEB.TO vs. LMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HEB.TO Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF | 1.58% | 44.00% | 27.37% |
LMAX.TO Hamilton Healthcare Yield Maximizer ETF | -3.55% | 7.03% | 4.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEB.TO achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly higher than LMAX.TO's -3.55% return.
HEB.TO
- 1D
- 2.50%
- 1M
- -4.22%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 14.53%
- 1Y
- 51.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LMAX.TO
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -6.57%
- YTD
- -3.55%
- 6M
- 3.86%
- 1Y
- -3.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HEB.TO vs. LMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEB.TO has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than LMAX.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HEB.TO vs. LMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HEB.TO
LMAX.TO
HEB.TO vs. LMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HEB.TO) and Hamilton Healthcare Yield Maximizer ETF (LMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HEB.TO | LMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.84 | -0.23 | +4.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.89 | -0.21 | +5.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.74 | 0.97 | +0.77 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.92 | -0.19 | +6.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.35 | -0.32 | +25.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HEB.TO | LMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.84 | -0.23 | +4.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.01 | 0.28 | +1.73 |
Correlation
The correlation between HEB.TO and LMAX.TO is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HEB.TO vs. LMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison
HEB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, less than LMAX.TO's 11.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HEB.TO Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF | 2.97% | 3.20% | 4.24% | 3.75% |
LMAX.TO Hamilton Healthcare Yield Maximizer ETF | 11.91% | 12.51% | 11.36% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HEB.TO vs. LMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEB.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.82%, smaller than the maximum LMAX.TO drawdown of -15.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEB.TO and LMAX.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEB.TO | LMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.82% | -15.87% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.86% | -12.62% | +3.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.09% | -8.34% | +2.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.51% | -4.90% | +2.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 8.00% | -5.93% |
Volatility
HEB.TO vs. LMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison
Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HEB.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.09% compared to Hamilton Healthcare Yield Maximizer ETF (LMAX.TO) at 3.75%. This indicates that HEB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HEB.TO | LMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.09% | 3.75% | +2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.25% | 9.73% | +0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.52% | 16.63% | -3.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.68% | 13.68% | -1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.68% | 13.68% | -1.00% |