HEB.TO vs. HEWB.TO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HEB.TO (Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF) and HEWB.TO (Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HEB.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index, while HEWB.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HEB.TO returned 37.74%/yr vs 37.83%/yr for HEWB.TO. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HEB.TO charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for HEWB.TO.

Performance

HEB.TO vs. HEWB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HEB.TO) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF (HEWB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HEB.TO having a 30.59% return and HEWB.TO slightly lower at 30.39%.

HEB.TO

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 8.34%
• YTD: 30.59%
• 6M: 30.46%
• 1Y: 74.14%
• 3Y*: 37.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HEWB.TO

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 8.23%
• YTD: 30.39%
• 6M: 30.16%
• 1Y: 73.55%
• 3Y*: 37.83%
• 5Y*: 20.43%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEB.TO vs. HEWB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HEB.TO Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF	30.59%	44.00%	23.55%	7.23%
HEWB.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF	30.39%	43.48%	24.54%	7.74%

Correlation

The correlation between HEB.TO and HEWB.TO is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2023	0.88

The correlation between HEB.TO and HEWB.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

HEB.TO vs. HEWB.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HEB.TO	HEWB.TO
Financial Services	100.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

HEB.TO vs. HEWB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEB.TO

HEB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 97
HEB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
HEB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
HEB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 98
HEB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
HEB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

HEWB.TO

HEWB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 97
HEWB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
HEWB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
HEWB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 98
HEWB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
HEWB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEB.TO vs. HEWB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HEB.TO) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF (HEWB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HEB.TO	HEWB.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.69	5.68	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	7.56	7.46	+0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.04	2.04	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.54	8.25	+0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	38.25	37.57	+0.68

HEB.TO vs. HEWB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 5.69, which is comparable to the HEWB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 5.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEB.TO and HEWB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HEB.TO vs. HEWB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEB.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.77%, smaller than the maximum HEWB.TO drawdown of -39.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEB.TO and HEWB.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HEB.TO	HEWB.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.77%	-39.43%	+24.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.86%	-8.97%	+0.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.77%	-14.84%	+0.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.40%	-7.21%	+4.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.96%	1.96%	0.00%

Volatility

HEB.TO vs. HEWB.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HEB.TO) is 3.75%, while Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF (HEWB.TO) has a volatility of 4.10%. This indicates that HEB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HEWB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HEB.TO	HEWB.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.75%	4.10%	-0.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.40%	11.39%	+0.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.30%	13.01%	+0.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.04%	14.03%	-0.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.04%	19.26%	-6.22%

HEB.TO vs. HEWB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEB.TO has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than HEWB.TO's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

HEB.TO vs. HEWB.TO - Dividend Comparison

HEB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, while HEWB.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
HEB.TO Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF	2.60%	3.20%	4.24%	3.75%
HEWB.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HEB.TO and HEWB.TO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, HEB.TO and HEWB.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, HEB.TO or HEWB.TO?

On fees, HEB.TO is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HEB.TO or HEWB.TO?

HEB.TO is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for HEWB.TO.

What is the main difference between HEB.TO and HEWB.TO?

HEB.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while HEWB.TO is Canada Equities. Both ETFs track Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for HEB.TO and 0.28% for HEWB.TO.