HEB.TO vs. CMAX.TO
HEB.TO (Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF) and CMAX.TO (Hamilton Canadian Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HEB.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index, while CMAX.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton. HEB.TO is passively managed, while CMAX.TO is actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
HEB.TO vs. CMAX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HEB.TO
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 5.56%
- YTD
- 19.19%
- 6M
- 25.16%
- 1Y
- 60.55%
- 3Y*
- 32.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMAX.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HEB.TO vs. CMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HEB.TO Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF | 3.92% |
CMAX.TO Hamilton Canadian Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 1.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEB.TO and CMAX.TO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2026 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEB.TO vs. CMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HEB.TO
CMAX.TO
HEB.TO vs. CMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HEB.TO) and Hamilton Canadian Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HEB.TO | CMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.87 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.87 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.91 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HEB.TO | CMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.35 | 2.84 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
HEB.TO vs. CMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEB.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.82%, which is greater than CMAX.TO's maximum drawdown of -1.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEB.TO and CMAX.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEB.TO | CMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.82% | -1.48% | -13.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.93% | -0.38% | -1.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.43% | -0.54% | -1.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | — | — |
Volatility
HEB.TO vs. CMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEB.TO | CMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.53% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.03% | 9.88% | +3.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.92% | 9.88% | +3.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.92% | 9.88% | +3.04% |
Dividends
HEB.TO vs. CMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison
HEB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than CMAX.TO's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CMAX.TO Hamilton Canadian Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HEB.TO Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF | 2.85% | 3.20% | 4.24% | 3.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEB.TO and CMAX.TO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HEB.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while CMAX.TO is Derivative Income.
Find the right allocation for HEB.TO and CMAX.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer