PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HEB.TO vs. CBNK.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HEB.TO vs. CBNK.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HEB.TO (Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF) and CBNK.TO (Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HEB.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index, while CBNK.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Mulvihill. HEB.TO is passively managed, while CBNK.TO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HEB.TO returned 32.46%/yr vs 38.97%/yr for CBNK.TO. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure.

Performance

HEB.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HEB.TO) and Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF (CBNK.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEB.TO achieves a 19.19% return, which is significantly lower than CBNK.TO's 25.56% return.

HEB.TO

1D
-0.37%
1M
5.56%
YTD
19.19%
6M
25.16%
1Y
60.55%
3Y*
32.46%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

CBNK.TO

1D
0.42%
1M
7.74%
YTD
25.56%
6M
32.17%
1Y
79.20%
3Y*
38.97%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEB.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023
HEB.TO
Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF		19.19%44.00%23.58%8.60%
CBNK.TO
Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF		25.56%51.67%27.42%6.88%

Correlation

The correlation between HEB.TO and CBNK.TO is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2023

0.82

The correlation between HEB.TO and CBNK.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF

Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF

Often compared with HEB.TO:
HEB.TO vs. HCA.TOHEB.TO vs. ZEB.TOHEB.TO vs. BNKL.TOHEB.TO vs. CIC.TOHEB.TO vs. HBA.TOHEB.TO vs. LMAX.TOHEB.TO vs. HCAL.TO
Often compared with CBNK.TO:
CBNK.TO vs. BANK.TOCBNK.TO vs. BKCL.TOCBNK.TO vs. YGOG.NEOCBNK.TO vs. CANY.TOCBNK.TO vs. NXF.TOCBNK.TO vs. ECHI.TOCBNK.TO vs. VDY.TO

Return for Risk

HEB.TO vs. CBNK.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HEB.TO
HEB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
HEB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
HEB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
CBNK.TO
CBNK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBNK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBNK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CBNK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBNK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEB.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HEB.TO) and Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF (CBNK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HEB.TOCBNK.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
4.67
5.12

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
6.44
6.76

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.87

1.87

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.87

7.94

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

30.91

34.25

-3.34

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HEB.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.67, which is comparable to the CBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio of 5.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEB.TO and CBNK.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HEB.TOCBNK.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.67

5.12

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.35

1.10

+1.25

Drawdowns

HEB.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEB.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.82%, smaller than the maximum CBNK.TO drawdown of -32.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEB.TO and CBNK.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HEB.TOCBNK.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.82%

-32.12%

+17.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.86%

-10.03%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.82%

-17.92%

+3.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-2.29%

+0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.43%

-10.92%

+8.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

2.32%

-0.36%

Volatility

HEB.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HEB.TO) is 4.84%, while Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF (CBNK.TO) has a volatility of 5.67%. This indicates that HEB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBNK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HEB.TOCBNK.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

5.67%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.53%

13.29%

-1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.03%

15.55%

-2.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.92%

17.55%

-4.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.92%

17.55%

-4.63%

Dividends

HEB.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Dividend Comparison

HEB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than CBNK.TO's 5.94% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022
CBNK.TO
Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF		5.94%5.86%8.25%9.59%7.85%
HEB.TO
Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF		2.85%3.20%4.24%3.75%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

HEB.TO and CBNK.TO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HEB.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while CBNK.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton and Mulvihill.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HEB.TO and CBNK.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer