HEAL vs. URA
HEAL (Global X HealthTech ETF) and URA (Global X Uranium ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HEAL is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Global X HealthTech Index, while URA is a Uranium fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HEAL returned -14.39%/yr vs 19.79%/yr for URA. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HEAL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for URA.
Performance
HEAL vs. URA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEAL achieves a -8.68% return, which is significantly lower than URA's 4.66% return.
HEAL
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- 7.54%
- YTD
- -8.68%
- 6M
- -10.67%
- 1Y
- -16.50%
- 3Y*
- -7.55%
- 5Y*
- -14.39%
- 10Y*
- —
URA
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- -8.66%
- YTD
- 4.66%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 21.17%
- 3Y*
- 33.83%
- 5Y*
- 19.79%
- 10Y*
- 16.20%
HEAL vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEAL Global X HealthTech ETF | -8.68% | -0.62% | -2.87% | -12.61% | -29.99% | -14.21% | 16.89% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.66% | 67.18% | -0.58% | 46.25% | -11.32% | 57.57% | 31.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEAL and URA is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020 | 0.41 |
HEAL vs. URA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HEAL
URA
Healthcare
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
HEAL
URA
-
Technology
HEAL
URA
Basic Materials
HEAL
-
URA
Communication Services
HEAL
-
URA
-
Consumer Cyclical
HEAL
-
URA
-
Consumer Defensive
HEAL
-
URA
-
Energy
HEAL
-
URA
Financial Services
HEAL
-
URA
-
Industrials
HEAL
-
URA
Real Estate
HEAL
-
URA
-
Utilities
HEAL
-
URA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEAL vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank
HEAL
URA
HEAL vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HEAL | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.11 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 0.68 | -1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | 1.44 | -2.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HEAL vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEAL drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEAL and URA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEAL | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.76% | -93.54% | +27.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.71% | -31.48% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.78% | -37.81% | +2.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.36% | -37.90% | -22.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.58% | -49.25% | -11.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.21% | -74.89% | +31.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.03% | 14.69% | +1.34% |
Volatility
HEAL vs. URA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL) is 7.43%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 17.92%. This indicates that HEAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEAL | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.43% | 17.92% | -10.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.74% | 39.35% | -22.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.40% | 51.33% | -28.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.47% | 43.91% | -17.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.28% | 37.94% | -11.66% |
HEAL vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEAL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEAL vs. URA - Dividend Comparison
HEAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than URA's 4.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEAL Global X HealthTech ETF | 0.36% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.66% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEAL and URA have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URA has higher volatility (17.92%) compared to HEAL (7.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEAL dropped -65.76% vs URA's -93.54%.
On 5-year performance, URA leads with 19.79% vs -14.39% for HEAL. On fees, HEAL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, HEAL has been the lower-risk option at 7.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, URA has performed better with a 19.79% return vs -14.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HEAL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.
URA has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 0.36% for HEAL.
HEAL is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while URA is Uranium. HEAL tracks Global X HealthTech Index, while URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HEAL and 0.69% for URA.
URA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.41 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HEAL and URA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer