HEAL vs. QQQ
HEAL (Global X HealthTech ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HEAL is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Global X HealthTech Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HEAL returned -14.71%/yr vs 17.97%/yr for QQQ. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HEAL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
HEAL vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEAL achieves a -15.57% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return.
HEAL
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- -15.57%
- 6M
- -20.78%
- 1Y
- -22.08%
- 3Y*
- -10.46%
- 5Y*
- -14.71%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 41.82%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.97%
- 10Y*
- 21.94%
HEAL vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEAL Global X HealthTech ETF | -15.57% | -0.62% | -2.87% | -12.61% | -29.99% | -14.21% | 23.87% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.30% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 20.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEAL and QQQ is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2020 | 0.64 |
The correlation between HEAL and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HEAL vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HEAL
QQQ
Healthcare
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
HEAL
QQQ
Technology
HEAL
QQQ
Basic Materials
HEAL
-
QQQ
Communication Services
HEAL
-
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
HEAL
-
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
HEAL
-
QQQ
Energy
HEAL
-
QQQ
Financial Services
HEAL
-
QQQ
Industrials
HEAL
-
QQQ
Real Estate
HEAL
-
QQQ
Utilities
HEAL
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEAL vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
HEAL
QQQ
HEAL vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HEAL | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.45 | -0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | 3.51 | -4.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | 13.49 | -14.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HEAL | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.01 | 2.64 | -3.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.56 | 0.81 | -1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.39 | 0.41 | -0.81 |
Drawdowns
HEAL vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEAL drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEAL and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEAL | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.76% | -82.97% | +17.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.71% | -11.96% | -18.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.78% | -22.77% | -13.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.36% | -35.12% | -25.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.55% | -0.26% | -63.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.02% | -32.79% | -10.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.13% | 3.11% | +12.02% |
Volatility
HEAL vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.49%. This indicates that HEAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEAL | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.21% | 4.49% | +0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.69% | 12.10% | +3.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.89% | 15.94% | +5.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.37% | 22.38% | +3.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.18% | 22.29% | +3.89% |
HEAL vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEAL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEAL vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
HEAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEAL Global X HealthTech ETF | 0.39% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEAL and QQQ have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HEAL has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to QQQ (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEAL dropped -65.76% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 17.97% vs -14.71% for HEAL. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 17.97% return vs -14.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HEAL.
HEAL and QQQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.39%.
HEAL is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. HEAL tracks Global X HealthTech Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HEAL and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HEAL and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer