HEAL vs. PPH
HEAL (Global X HealthTech ETF) and PPH (VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - HEAL tracks the Global X HealthTech Index while PPH tracks the MVIS US Listed Pharmaceutical 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HEAL returned -12.46%/yr vs 10.12%/yr for PPH. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HEAL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for PPH.
Performance
HEAL vs. PPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEAL achieves a -3.82% return, which is significantly lower than PPH's 4.95% return.
HEAL
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 8.66%
- 6M
- -7.84%
- YTD
- -3.82%
- 1Y
- -10.83%
- 3Y*
- -7.80%
- 5Y*
- -12.46%
- 10Y*
- —
PPH
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- 6M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 4.95%
- 1Y
- 23.19%
- 3Y*
- 13.36%
- 5Y*
- 10.12%
- 10Y*
- 7.88%
HEAL vs. PPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEAL Global X HealthTech ETF | -3.82% | -0.62% | -2.87% | -12.61% | -29.99% | -14.21% | 16.89% |
PPH VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF | 4.95% | 22.00% | 8.05% | 6.95% | 2.64% | 17.79% | 4.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEAL and PPH is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020 | 0.41 |
HEAL vs. PPH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HEAL
PPH
Healthcare
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
HEAL
PPH
Technology
HEAL
PPH
-
Basic Materials
HEAL
-
PPH
-
Communication Services
HEAL
-
PPH
-
Consumer Cyclical
HEAL
-
PPH
-
Consumer Defensive
HEAL
-
PPH
-
Energy
HEAL
-
PPH
-
Financial Services
HEAL
-
PPH
-
Industrials
HEAL
-
PPH
Real Estate
HEAL
-
PPH
-
Utilities
HEAL
-
PPH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEAL vs. PPH — Risk / Return Rank
HEAL
PPH
HEAL vs. PPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL) and VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HEAL | PPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.23 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | 2.16 | -2.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.66 | 5.25 | -5.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HEAL vs. PPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEAL drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, which is greater than PPH's maximum drawdown of -51.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEAL and PPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEAL | PPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.76% | -51.45% | -14.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.71% | -10.76% | -19.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.78% | -18.06% | -17.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.14% | -20.26% | -38.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.48% | -4.32% | -54.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.34% | -17.25% | -26.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.34% | 4.43% | +11.91% |
Volatility
HEAL vs. PPH - Volatility Comparison
Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL) has a higher volatility of 7.35% compared to VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) at 6.31%. This indicates that HEAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEAL | PPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.35% | 6.31% | +1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.15% | 13.11% | +4.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.67% | 18.31% | +4.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.59% | 15.34% | +11.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.29% | 17.01% | +9.28% |
HEAL vs. PPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEAL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PPH's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEAL vs. PPH - Dividend Comparison
HEAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than PPH's 2.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEAL Global X HealthTech ETF | 0.26% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PPH VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF | 2.03% | 1.78% | 1.98% | 2.09% | 1.55% | 1.62% | 1.66% | 1.77% | 1.97% | 1.92% | 2.43% | 1.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEAL and PPH have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HEAL has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to PPH (6.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEAL dropped -65.76% vs PPH's -51.45%.
On 5-year performance, PPH leads with 10.12% vs -12.46% for HEAL. On fees, PPH is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, PPH has been the lower-risk option at 6.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PPH has performed better with a 10.12% return vs -12.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PPH is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HEAL.
PPH has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 0.26% for HEAL.
HEAL tracks Global X HealthTech Index, while PPH tracks MVIS US Listed Pharmaceutical 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HEAL and 0.36% for PPH.
PPH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HEAL and PPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer