PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HEAL vs. GERM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HEAL vs. GERM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL) and Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HEAL

1D
-1.16%
1M
-2.59%
YTD
-15.57%
6M
-20.78%
1Y
-22.08%
3Y*
-10.46%
5Y*
-14.71%
10Y*

GERM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
0.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEAL vs. GERM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
HEAL
Global X HealthTech ETF
-15.57%-0.62%8.26%
GERM
Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

HEAL vs. GERM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HEAL
GERM

Healthcare

96.0%
99.3%

Technology

3.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.4%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

HEAL
96.0%
GERM
99.3%

Technology

HEAL
3.2%
GERM

-

Basic Materials

HEAL

-

GERM

-

Communication Services

HEAL

-

GERM

-

Consumer Cyclical

HEAL

-

GERM

-

Consumer Defensive

HEAL

-

GERM

-

Energy

HEAL

-

GERM

-

Financial Services

HEAL

-

GERM
0.4%

Industrials

HEAL

-

GERM

-

Real Estate

HEAL

-

GERM

-

Utilities

HEAL

-

GERM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HEAL vs. GERM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEAL
HEAL Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
HEAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEAL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
HEAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEAL Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

GERM
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEAL vs. GERM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL) and Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HEALGERMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.46

HEAL vs. GERM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HEALGERMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.39

Drawdowns

HEAL vs. GERM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEAL drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, which is greater than GERM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEAL and GERM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HEALGERMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.76%

0.00%

-65.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.71%

0.00%

-30.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.55%

0.00%

-63.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.02%

0.00%

-43.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.13%

0.00%

+15.13%

Volatility

HEAL vs. GERM - Volatility Comparison

Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) at 0.00%. This indicates that HEAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GERM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HEALGERMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

0.00%

+5.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.69%

0.00%

+15.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.89%

0.00%

+21.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.37%

0.00%

+26.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.18%

0.00%

+26.18%

HEAL vs. GERM - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEAL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GERM's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

HEAL vs. GERM - Dividend Comparison

HEAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, while GERM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GERM
Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HEAL
Global X HealthTech ETF
0.39%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


HEAL has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to GERM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEAL dropped -65.76% vs GERM's 0.00%.

On 1-year performance, GERM leads with 0.00% vs -22.08% for HEAL. On fees, HEAL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, GERM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GERM has performed better with a 0.00% return vs -22.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HEAL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for GERM.

HEAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.00% for GERM.

HEAL tracks Global X HealthTech Index, while GERM tracks Prime Treatments, Testing and Advancements Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HEAL and 0.68% for GERM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HEAL and GERM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer