PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HEAE.L vs. ICLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HEAE.L vs. ICLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Europe Health Care UCITS ETF (HEAE.L) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HEAE.L is traded in GBP, while ICLN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ICLN values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEAE.L achieves a -1.49% return, which is significantly lower than ICLN's 27.98% return. Over the past 10 years, HEAE.L has underperformed ICLN with an annualized return of 5.38%, while ICLN has yielded a comparatively higher 12.25% annualized return.


HEAE.L

1D
0.00%
1M
1.12%
YTD
-1.49%
6M
-0.50%
1Y
7.43%
3Y*
3.82%
5Y*
2.06%
10Y*
5.38%

ICLN

1D
0.96%
1M
-5.49%
YTD
27.98%
6M
26.69%
1Y
62.20%
3Y*
3.13%
5Y*
0.82%
10Y*
12.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEAE.L vs. ICLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HEAE.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Health Care UCITS ETF
-1.49%12.67%-0.58%5.53%-14.69%25.32%-2.05%31.62%-0.70%2.75%
ICLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
27.98%36.57%-24.42%-24.38%5.82%-23.46%134.72%38.87%-3.64%10.96%

Correlation

The correlation between HEAE.L and ICLN is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011

0.24

The correlation between HEAE.L and ICLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HEAE.L vs. ICLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEAE.L
HEAE.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
HEAE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEAE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEAE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
HEAE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEAE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

ICLN
ICLN Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ICLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICLN Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ICLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICLN Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEAE.L vs. ICLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Health Care UCITS ETF (HEAE.L) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HEAE.LICLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.38

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

4.03

-3.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.09

13.19

-12.10

HEAE.L vs. ICLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEAE.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the ICLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEAE.L and ICLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HEAE.L vs. ICLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEAE.L drawdown since its inception was -25.54%, smaller than the maximum ICLN drawdown of -84.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEAE.L and ICLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HEAE.LICLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.54%

-84.40%

+58.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.73%

-15.79%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.51%

-42.62%

+18.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.51%

-57.04%

+32.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.51%

-64.68%

+40.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.03%

-32.10%

+22.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.54%

-57.59%

+49.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.97%

4.82%

+1.15%

Volatility

HEAE.L vs. ICLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI Europe Health Care UCITS ETF (HEAE.L) is 5.19%, while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a volatility of 12.56%. This indicates that HEAE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HEAE.LICLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.19%

12.56%

-7.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.20%

21.31%

-9.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.80%

26.75%

-9.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.66%

25.64%

-8.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.08%

26.28%

-10.20%

HEAE.L vs. ICLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEAE.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ICLN's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

HEAE.L vs. ICLN - Dividend Comparison

HEAE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ICLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HEAE.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Health Care UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ICLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
1.28%1.63%1.85%1.59%0.89%1.18%0.34%1.36%2.77%2.49%3.88%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


HEAE.L and ICLN have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HEAE.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HEAE.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ICLN.

HEAE.L is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while ICLN is Alternative Energy Equities. HEAE.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while ICLN tracks S&P Global Clean Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for HEAE.L and 0.39% for ICLN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HEAE.L and ICLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer