PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDUS vs. BUFH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDUS vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF (HDUS) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDUS achieves a 10.84% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.45% return.


HDUS

1D
-0.74%
1M
4.44%
YTD
10.84%
6M
10.51%
1Y
26.49%
3Y*
21.13%
5Y*
10Y*

BUFH

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.75%
YTD
2.45%
6M
2.82%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDUS vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HDUS
Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF
10.84%12.52%
BUFH
FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF
2.45%3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between HDUS and BUFH is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.74

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDUS vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDUS
HDUS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
HDUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
HDUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFH
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDUS vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF (HDUS) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDUSBUFHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.05

HDUS vs. BUFH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDUSBUFHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.42

2.91

-1.49

Drawdowns

HDUS vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDUS drawdown since its inception was -17.94%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDUS and BUFH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDUSBUFHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.94%

-1.53%

-16.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-0.05%

-0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.03%

-0.18%

-1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

Volatility

HDUS vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDUSBUFHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.96%

2.37%

+8.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.15%

2.37%

+11.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.15%

2.37%

+11.78%

HDUS vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

HDUS vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison

HDUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUFH
FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HDUS
Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF
1.32%1.45%1.58%1.36%0.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDUS and BUFH have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HDUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HDUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.

HDUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.

HDUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for HDUS and 0.95% for BUFH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDUS and BUFH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer