HDUS vs. BUFH
HDUS (Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HDUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Hartford Disciplined US Equity Index, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HDUS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.
Performance
HDUS vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDUS achieves a 10.84% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.45% return.
HDUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 4.44%
- YTD
- 10.84%
- 6M
- 10.51%
- 1Y
- 26.49%
- 3Y*
- 21.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFH
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 2.45%
- 6M
- 2.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDUS vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HDUS Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF | 10.84% | 12.52% |
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 2.45% | 3.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDUS and BUFH is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDUS vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank
HDUS
BUFH
HDUS vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF (HDUS) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDUS | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.05 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDUS | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.42 | 2.91 | -1.49 |
Drawdowns
HDUS vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDUS drawdown since its inception was -17.94%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDUS and BUFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDUS | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.94% | -1.53% | -16.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -0.05% | -0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.03% | -0.18% | -1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | — | — |
Volatility
HDUS vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDUS | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.48% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.13% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.96% | 2.37% | +8.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 2.37% | +11.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 2.37% | +11.78% |
HDUS vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDUS vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison
HDUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HDUS Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF | 1.32% | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.36% | 0.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDUS and BUFH have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HDUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HDUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.
HDUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.
HDUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for HDUS and 0.95% for BUFH.
Find the right allocation for HDUS and BUFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer