HDSVX vs. HWSAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Hodges Small Intrinsic Value Fund (HDSVX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX).
HDSVX is managed by Hodges. It was launched on Dec 26, 2013. HWSAX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Jun 10, 2000.
Performance
HDSVX vs. HWSAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HDSVX vs. HWSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDSVX Hodges Small Intrinsic Value Fund | 2.44% | -0.73% | 7.82% | 18.32% | -9.87% | 43.97% | 6.60% | 29.42% | -22.85% | 8.77% |
HWSAX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A | 9.00% | 1.38% | 4.77% | 18.56% | 2.81% | 35.32% | -0.50% | 20.26% | -15.23% | 7.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDSVX achieves a 2.44% return, which is significantly lower than HWSAX's 9.00% return. Over the past 10 years, HDSVX has underperformed HWSAX with an annualized return of 8.87%, while HWSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.96% annualized return.
HDSVX
- 1D
- 2.77%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- YTD
- 2.44%
- 6M
- 0.84%
- 1Y
- 15.26%
- 3Y*
- 7.57%
- 5Y*
- 5.40%
- 10Y*
- 8.87%
HWSAX
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 9.00%
- 6M
- 7.38%
- 1Y
- 18.60%
- 3Y*
- 10.15%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HDSVX vs. HWSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDSVX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than HWSAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HDSVX vs. HWSAX — Risk / Return Rank
HDSVX
HWSAX
HDSVX vs. HWSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hodges Small Intrinsic Value Fund (HDSVX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDSVX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.62 | 0.78 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.03 | 1.22 | -0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.17 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 1.17 | -0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.03 | 4.34 | -1.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDSVX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 0.78 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.42 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.41 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.47 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between HDSVX and HWSAX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HDSVX vs. HWSAX - Dividend Comparison
HDSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, more than HWSAX's 0.64% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDSVX Hodges Small Intrinsic Value Fund | 1.07% | 1.09% | 9.55% | 0.06% | 2.93% | 6.17% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 9.82% | 2.93% | 0.00% | 0.81% |
HWSAX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A | 0.64% | 0.69% | 8.19% | 1.79% | 13.39% | 0.22% | 0.63% | 4.62% | 9.45% | 4.80% | 0.00% | 11.67% |
Drawdowns
HDSVX vs. HWSAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDSVX drawdown since its inception was -58.65%, smaller than the maximum HWSAX drawdown of -72.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDSVX and HWSAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDSVX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.65% | -72.14% | +13.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.73% | -16.44% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.24% | -26.98% | -1.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.65% | -53.82% | -4.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.56% | -1.09% | -7.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.88% | -11.03% | +2.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.13% | 4.43% | +0.70% |
Volatility
HDSVX vs. HWSAX - Volatility Comparison
Hodges Small Intrinsic Value Fund (HDSVX) has a higher volatility of 6.53% compared to Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX) at 4.45%. This indicates that HDSVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HDSVX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.53% | 4.45% | +2.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.55% | 12.99% | +1.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.02% | 23.99% | +1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.14% | 21.71% | +0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.34% | 24.65% | +0.69% |