PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDSVX vs. PVCMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDSVX vs. PVCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hodges Small Intrinsic Value Fund (HDSVX) and Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class (PVCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDSVX achieves a 23.25% return, which is significantly higher than PVCMX's 1.73% return.


HDSVX

1D
1.20%
1M
5.28%
YTD
23.25%
6M
20.64%
1Y
37.76%
3Y*
13.83%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*
11.28%

PVCMX

1D
-0.40%
1M
-0.40%
YTD
1.73%
6M
1.81%
1Y
4.88%
3Y*
5.22%
5Y*
4.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDSVX vs. PVCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HDSVX
Hodges Small Intrinsic Value Fund
23.25%-0.73%7.82%18.32%-9.87%43.97%6.60%19.80%
PVCMX
Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class
1.73%4.45%4.24%9.47%3.17%3.72%19.13%1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between HDSVX and PVCMX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019

0.67

The correlation between HDSVX and PVCMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDSVX vs. PVCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDSVX
HDSVX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
HDSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
HDSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

PVCMX
PVCMX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
PVCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PVCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
PVCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
PVCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
PVCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDSVX vs. PVCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hodges Small Intrinsic Value Fund (HDSVX) and Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class (PVCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HDSVXPVCMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.21

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

1.77

+1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.07

5.13

+3.94

HDSVX vs. PVCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDSVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the PVCMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDSVX and PVCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HDSVX vs. PVCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDSVX drawdown since its inception was -58.65%, which is greater than PVCMX's maximum drawdown of -7.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDSVX and PVCMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDSVXPVCMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.65%

-7.44%

-51.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.90%

-2.81%

-9.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.24%

-7.44%

-20.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.24%

-7.44%

-20.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.28%

+1.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.75%

-1.27%

-7.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

0.97%

+3.32%

Volatility

HDSVX vs. PVCMX - Volatility Comparison

Hodges Small Intrinsic Value Fund (HDSVX) has a higher volatility of 5.86% compared to Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class (PVCMX) at 1.10%. This indicates that HDSVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PVCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDSVXPVCMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.86%

1.10%

+4.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.63%

2.81%

+10.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.42%

4.22%

+16.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.14%

5.21%

+16.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.41%

6.30%

+19.11%

HDSVX vs. PVCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDSVX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PVCMX's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

HDSVX vs. PVCMX - Dividend Comparison

HDSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than PVCMX's 4.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDSVX
Hodges Small Intrinsic Value Fund
0.89%1.09%9.55%0.06%2.93%6.17%0.00%0.02%9.82%2.93%0.00%0.81%
PVCMX
Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class
4.71%4.80%6.95%4.84%2.30%1.98%2.70%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDSVX and PVCMX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HDSVX has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to PVCMX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDSVX dropped -58.65% vs PVCMX's -7.44%.

HDSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDSVX and PVCMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer