PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDPMX vs. FMDCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDPMX vs. FMDCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hodges Fund (HDPMX) and Federated Hermes Mid Cap Index Fund (FMDCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDPMX achieves a 22.63% return, which is significantly higher than FMDCX's 14.67% return. Over the past 10 years, HDPMX has outperformed FMDCX with an annualized return of 13.87%, while FMDCX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.55% annualized return.


HDPMX

1D
3.15%
1M
-4.75%
6M
17.93%
YTD
22.63%
1Y
39.06%
3Y*
27.18%
5Y*
15.00%
10Y*
13.87%
ALL TIME*
10.33%

FMDCX

1D
0.83%
1M
-0.93%
6M
9.26%
YTD
14.67%
1Y
20.59%
3Y*
12.62%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*
10.55%
ALL TIME*
10.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

HDPMX vs. FMDCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDPMX
Hodges Fund
22.63%24.06%29.32%29.81%-21.80%29.50%29.58%23.02%-34.39%13.87%
FMDCX
Federated Hermes Mid Cap Index Fund
14.67%6.95%13.34%16.38%-13.88%25.28%13.37%25.36%-11.51%15.43%

Correlation

The correlation between HDPMX and FMDCX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1992

0.84

The correlation between HDPMX and FMDCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDPMX vs. FMDCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HDPMX
HDPMX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
HDPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
HDPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FMDCX
FMDCX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FMDCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMDCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMDCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FMDCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMDCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HDPMX vs. FMDCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hodges Fund (HDPMX) and Federated Hermes Mid Cap Index Fund (FMDCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HDPMXFMDCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.26

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

2.70

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.58

9.97

-1.39

HDPMX vs. FMDCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDPMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the FMDCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDPMX and FMDCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HDPMX vs. FMDCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDPMX drawdown since its inception was -69.66%, which is greater than FMDCX's maximum drawdown of -55.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDPMX and FMDCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDPMXFMDCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.66%

-55.36%

-14.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.05%

-8.75%

-4.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.65%

-24.16%

-8.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.68%

-24.16%

-12.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.16%

-42.05%

-25.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.73%

-2.18%

-6.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.69%

-6.78%

-8.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

2.28%

+1.60%

Volatility

HDPMX vs. FMDCX - Volatility Comparison

Hodges Fund (HDPMX) has a higher volatility of 6.94% compared to Federated Hermes Mid Cap Index Fund (FMDCX) at 3.46%. This indicates that HDPMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMDCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDPMXFMDCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.94%

3.46%

+3.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.29%

11.57%

+7.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.42%

16.25%

+8.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.80%

20.29%

+9.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.42%

21.33%

+9.09%

HDPMX vs. FMDCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDPMX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than FMDCX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

HDPMX vs. FMDCX - Dividend Comparison

HDPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.74%, less than FMDCX's 9.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMDCX
Federated Hermes Mid Cap Index Fund
9.28%10.67%15.63%11.46%12.33%22.20%15.60%10.60%26.14%17.30%11.41%14.68%
HDPMX
Hodges Fund
7.74%9.50%15.93%0.72%0.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%10.67%7.26%0.00%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDPMX and FMDCX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HDPMX has higher volatility (6.94%) compared to FMDCX (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDPMX dropped -69.66% vs FMDCX's -55.36%.

FMDCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDPMX and FMDCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer