HDPBX vs. FZALX

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

HDPBX (Hodges Blue Chip Equity Income Fund) and FZALX (Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, HDPBX returned 16.92%/yr vs 16.48%/yr for FZALX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HDPBX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for FZALX.

Performance

HDPBX vs. FZALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hodges Blue Chip Equity Income Fund (HDPBX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDPBX achieves a 8.89% return, which is significantly lower than FZALX's 10.83% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HDPBX having a 16.92% annualized return and FZALX not far behind at 16.48%.

HDPBX

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 2.30%
• 6M: 6.30%
• YTD: 8.89%
• 1Y: 21.79%
• 3Y*: 29.08%
• 5Y*: 18.64%
• 10Y*: 16.92%

FZALX

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: 1.96%
• 6M: 7.91%
• YTD: 10.83%
• 1Y: 23.39%
• 3Y*: 24.35%
• 5Y*: 16.56%
• 10Y*: 16.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDPBX vs. FZALX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HDPBX Hodges Blue Chip Equity Income Fund	8.89%	23.40%	52.30%	21.54%	-11.52%	23.61%	15.88%	30.72%	-9.38%	24.73%
FZALX Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z	10.83%	27.07%	26.13%	26.63%	-8.89%	26.44%	13.06%	31.25%	-7.31%	18.01%

Correlation

The correlation between HDPBX and FZALX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2013	0.90

The correlation between HDPBX and FZALX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HDPBX vs. FZALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDPBX

HDPBX Risk / Return Rank: 46
HDPBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
HDPBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
HDPBX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
HDPBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
HDPBX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

FZALX

FZALX Risk / Return Rank: 74
FZALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FZALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FZALX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FZALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FZALX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDPBX vs. FZALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hodges Blue Chip Equity Income Fund (HDPBX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HDPBX	FZALX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	1.90	-0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	2.64	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.34	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	2.65	-0.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.15	11.60	-4.45

HDPBX vs. FZALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDPBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the FZALX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDPBX and FZALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HDPBX vs. FZALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDPBX drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, roughly equal to the maximum FZALX drawdown of -35.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDPBX and FZALX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HDPBX	FZALX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.10%	-35.23%	+0.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.48%	-8.99%	-3.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.96%	-18.49%	-2.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.76%	-23.25%	+1.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.10%	-35.23%	+0.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.21%	-0.84%	-0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.95%	-3.75%	-0.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.10%	2.05%	+1.05%

Volatility

HDPBX vs. FZALX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hodges Blue Chip Equity Income Fund (HDPBX) is 3.46%, while Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX) has a volatility of 3.71%. This indicates that HDPBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FZALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HDPBX	FZALX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.46%	3.71%	-0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.03%	9.70%	+1.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.02%	12.60%	+1.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.95%	16.75%	+2.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.27%	18.08%	+1.19%

HDPBX vs. FZALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDPBX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FZALX's 0.51% expense ratio.

Dividends

HDPBX vs. FZALX - Dividend Comparison

HDPBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, more than FZALX's 3.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FZALX Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z	3.64%	4.04%	2.83%	2.17%	4.51%	4.92%	8.14%	13.19%	21.94%	16.56%	2.12%	4.33%
HDPBX Hodges Blue Chip Equity Income Fund	4.48%	4.97%	27.38%	0.90%	8.75%	10.88%	5.26%	7.59%	5.83%	9.44%	5.04%	7.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HDPBX and FZALX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, HDPBX and FZALX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, HDPBX or FZALX?

FZALX has higher volatility (3.71%) compared to HDPBX (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDPBX dropped -35.10% vs FZALX's -35.23%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FZALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.