PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDLV.L vs. BYBU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDLV.L vs. BYBU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist (HDLV.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDLV.L achieves a 4.40% return, which is significantly lower than BYBU.L's 8.18% return.


HDLV.L

1D
0.05%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
4.40%
6M
5.51%
1Y
8.68%
3Y*
10.98%
5Y*
5.04%
10Y*
6.48%

BYBU.L

1D
0.96%
1M
4.76%
YTD
8.18%
6M
9.93%
1Y
22.65%
3Y*
18.64%
5Y*
10.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDLV.L vs. BYBU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDLV.L
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist
4.40%3.58%16.39%1.20%0.46%24.79%-10.93%18.82%-7.10%6.47%
BYBU.L
Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD
8.18%17.38%14.97%15.90%-12.83%37.69%3.27%31.62%-6.60%8.16%

Correlation

The correlation between HDLV.L and BYBU.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2017

0.35

The correlation between HDLV.L and BYBU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.53 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HDLV.L vs. BYBU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HDLV.L
BYBU.L

Real Estate

20.1%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

17.8%
3.7%

Financial Services

15.6%
27.9%

Energy

14.1%
5.2%

Utilities

13.7%
0.9%

Communication Services

8.6%
4.6%

Healthcare

5.1%
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

3.4%
15.8%

Technology

1.4%
22.4%

Industrials

0.0%
9.0%

Basic Materials

-

3.1%

Real Estate

HDLV.L
20.1%
BYBU.L
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

HDLV.L
17.8%
BYBU.L
3.7%

Financial Services

HDLV.L
15.6%
BYBU.L
27.9%

Energy

HDLV.L
14.1%
BYBU.L
5.2%

Utilities

HDLV.L
13.7%
BYBU.L
0.9%

Communication Services

HDLV.L
8.6%
BYBU.L
4.6%

Healthcare

HDLV.L
5.1%
BYBU.L
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

HDLV.L
3.4%
BYBU.L
15.8%

Technology

HDLV.L
1.4%
BYBU.L
22.4%

Industrials

HDLV.L
0.0%
BYBU.L
9.0%

Basic Materials

HDLV.L

-

BYBU.L
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDLV.L vs. BYBU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDLV.L
HDLV.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
HDLV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDLV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDLV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
HDLV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDLV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

BYBU.L
BYBU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BYBU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BYBU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
BYBU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
BYBU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
BYBU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDLV.L vs. BYBU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist (HDLV.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDLV.LBYBU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.33

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

4.34

-3.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.80

12.04

-9.24

HDLV.L vs. BYBU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDLV.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the BYBU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDLV.L and BYBU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDLV.LBYBU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

1.90

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.83

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

1.14

-0.67

Drawdowns

HDLV.L vs. BYBU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDLV.L drawdown since its inception was -41.02%, which is greater than BYBU.L's maximum drawdown of -28.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDLV.L and BYBU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDLV.LBYBU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.02%

-28.64%

-12.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.16%

-5.19%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.59%

-19.21%

+4.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.04%

-22.11%

+2.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.15%

0.00%

-5.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.70%

-4.86%

-0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

1.88%

+1.22%

Volatility

HDLV.L vs. BYBU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist (HDLV.L) is 3.06%, while Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBU.L) has a volatility of 3.55%. This indicates that HDLV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BYBU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDLV.LBYBU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

3.55%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

8.14%

-0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.52%

11.86%

-1.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.99%

21.25%

-7.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.16%

27.74%

-11.58%

HDLV.L vs. BYBU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDLV.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BYBU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

HDLV.L vs. BYBU.L - Dividend Comparison

HDLV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, while BYBU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BYBU.L
Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HDLV.L
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist
3.74%3.91%3.54%4.04%3.56%3.37%4.35%3.69%3.79%3.07%3.07%1.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDLV.L and BYBU.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BYBU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BYBU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HDLV.L.

HDLV.L tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while BYBU.L tracks S&P 500 Buyback NTR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HDLV.L and 0.15% for BYBU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDLV.L and BYBU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer