HDLG.L vs. BYBU.L
HDLG.L (Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF) and BYBU.L (Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD) are both S&P 500 funds - HDLG.L tracks the S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index while BYBU.L tracks the S&P 500 Buyback NTR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HDLG.L returned 6.17%/yr vs 11.35%/yr for BYBU.L. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HDLG.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BYBU.L.
Performance
HDLG.L vs. BYBU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HDLG.L is traded in GBp, while BYBU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BYBU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDLG.L achieves a 4.61% return, which is significantly lower than BYBU.L's 8.62% return.
HDLG.L
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 4.61%
- 6M
- 4.86%
- 1Y
- 9.65%
- 3Y*
- 8.12%
- 5Y*
- 6.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.28%
BYBU.L
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 5.72%
- YTD
- 8.62%
- 6M
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 23.84%
- 3Y*
- 15.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.35%
- 10Y*
- —
HDLG.L vs. BYBU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDLG.L Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF | 4.61% | -3.57% | 18.46% | -4.52% | 12.44% | 26.47% | -13.89% | 15.07% | -1.67% | 3.00% |
BYBU.L Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD | 8.62% | 9.02% | 16.67% | 10.84% | -3.19% | 37.48% | 2.26% | 25.34% | -0.50% | 4.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDLG.L and BYBU.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2017 | 0.29 |
The correlation between HDLG.L and BYBU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HDLG.L vs. BYBU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDLG.L
BYBU.L
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
HDLG.L
BYBU.L
Consumer Defensive
HDLG.L
BYBU.L
Financial Services
HDLG.L
BYBU.L
Utilities
HDLG.L
BYBU.L
Energy
HDLG.L
BYBU.L
Communication Services
HDLG.L
BYBU.L
Healthcare
HDLG.L
BYBU.L
Consumer Cyclical
HDLG.L
BYBU.L
Technology
HDLG.L
BYBU.L
Industrials
HDLG.L
BYBU.L
Basic Materials
HDLG.L
BYBU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDLG.L vs. BYBU.L — Risk / Return Rank
HDLG.L
BYBU.L
HDLG.L vs. BYBU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLG.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDLG.L | BYBU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.34 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 4.69 | -3.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.55 | 13.40 | -9.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDLG.L | BYBU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 1.97 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.98 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 1.22 | -0.64 |
Drawdowns
HDLG.L vs. BYBU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDLG.L drawdown since its inception was -33.75%, which is greater than BYBU.L's maximum drawdown of -23.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDLG.L and BYBU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDLG.L | BYBU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.75% | -23.51% | -10.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.92% | -5.06% | -1.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.61% | -20.81% | +5.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.84% | -20.81% | +2.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.90% | 0.00% | -4.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.30% | -4.19% | -2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.71% | 1.78% | +0.93% |
Volatility
HDLG.L vs. BYBU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLG.L) is 2.93%, while Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBU.L) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that HDLG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BYBU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDLG.L | BYBU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.93% | 3.26% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.26% | 8.60% | -0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.53% | 12.07% | -1.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.96% | 20.07% | -7.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.66% | 25.20% | -9.54% |
HDLG.L vs. BYBU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDLG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BYBU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDLG.L vs. BYBU.L - Dividend Comparison
HDLG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, while BYBU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYBU.L Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HDLG.L Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF | 3.73% | 3.93% | 3.46% | 4.12% | 3.49% | 3.30% | 4.65% | 3.77% | 3.67% | 3.18% | 2.88% | 1.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDLG.L and BYBU.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BYBU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BYBU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HDLG.L.
HDLG.L tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while BYBU.L tracks S&P 500 Buyback NTR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HDLG.L and 0.15% for BYBU.L.
Find the right allocation for HDLG.L and BYBU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer